Latest Comments
The “forced” argument raises the image of fluoridation opponents standing around gulping down offensively odiferous tap water which they know has just been recently contaminated with a truckload of horse...
It’s interesting that the fluoridation opponents posting here seem to fear the facts presented by RJohnson to the extent of trying to steer other readers away from them. This is...
(Continued) Perhaps you can provide specific scientific evidence to prove Reynolds’ anti-F opinions: 1) Drinking optimally fluoridated water “causes fluorosis which actually increases the risk of cavities”. 2) Drinking optimally...
Limeback - Wow, what a "great" point by point non-science-based response to my specific science-based criticisms of Reynolds' unsupported opinion letter. Unfortunately science training and experience can be hacked by...
jJMuller - You are correct that the arsenic level from fluoridation chemicals “does get diluted, down to fractions of a parts per billion”. However, your groundless fear is unwarranted. According...
No countries "avoid fluoridation like the plague." There are many reasons some countries don't employ the public health measure of fluoridation, but those decisions are not based on the false...
jwillie6 - the fact is, all studies you referenced have one, usually more, of the following characteristics which invalidates them as providing any proof of any harm from drinking optimally...
Exactly who forces you to drink water that contains fluoride?
jwillie6 - In case you have not understood the concept of exposure levels, there is absolutely no legitimate scientific evidence that optimally fluoridated water (0.7 pp, F-) is toxic. This...
RJ, you have rightfully earned a nomination for the Annual Darwin Awards. Suggesting that an individual increase their risk of bladder and lung cancer by increasing their already existent exposure...