Latest Comments
No, Dawn, we don't have to revisit and rewrite any laws just because you have an axe to grind. As Spyglass pointed out, with was an unethical act. Trying to...
We need more council members like Frank!
It definitely wasn’t ethical…IMHO. I’ll also say it didn’t surprise me.
You won't be charged with a felony for having monopoly money in your pocket because it has little resemblance to the real thing. That isn't the case with Eric's sample...
It would be nonsense to argue that when this law was passed as SB1, Sec34-1913 in 1964, that the legislators intended it in any way to apply digital image technology...
Despite PTCitizen's discussion of intelligence, it's arguable that he is partially correct. I'm not sure the code cited specifically addresses the alteration and distribution of a sample ballot. While it...
I'm sure you know A.K.
The statute refers to printed material. It says nothing about digital images. Like I said... no intelligent person...
I agree, I think overall they have done an excellent job..I like the improvements they have made to the parks, etc around the City. Keep it up.
I agree with Dawn Haddocks (December 3, 2021 at 12:55 pm) statement, "If in fact it was passed in 1964, it’s probably a good time to lobby a revisit and...