Citing "sovereign immunity," attorneys for Peachtree City are
asking that a lawsuit brought against the city by Peachtree National Bank
seeking payment on nearly $1 million in bad loans made to the city's
Development Authority be dismissed.
A similar Motion to Dismiss has been filed in the case by the Peachtree
City Tourism Association, which was also named in the suit filed in August.
The bank sued the Development Authority, the city and the Tourism Association
to recoup the loans that have gone unpaid since November 2003, when the authority
gave up management of the Peachtree City Tennis Center and Frederick Brown
Jr. Amphitheater.
The money was allegedly taken out over a period of years by the DAPC and
used to fund operating expenses at the Peachtree City Tennis Center, which
is now being managed by the Tourism Association.
Without a revenue source, the DAPC has been unable to repay the loans.
In the suit, the bank accused the city of acting in bad faith to convert
the DAPC's $1.6 million in assets to the city's ownership, which
would shield them from being taken by the bank in return for failure to pay
off the loans.
The city has refused the pay the loans, which including accrued interest
now total $1.04 million, according to the suit.
Ted Meeker, attorney for Peachtree City, said the city is immune from the
lawsuit because the actions of the DAPC were independent of the city. Georgia
law "prohibits any obligation of a development authority from becoming
an obligation of a city," Meeker writes.
Additionally, the motion argues that the DAPC never had the legal authority
to take out "promissory notes" to begin with outside of the issuance
of bonds. Further, Meeker argues, the DAPC at the time of the loans was operating
outside the law because it lacked the authority to operate the tennis center
and amphitheater. A change in state law to allow development authorities
to run those types of venues wasn't passed in the legislature until
2003.
"The core of it is that the Development Authority took out the loans,
not the city," Meeker said. "We're not sure the Development
Authority could take out promissory notes to start with, and under no circumstances
does it appear a city can be held liable for the debt."
Regarding the Tourism Association, the bank suit alleged that the new management
group was operating as an "alter ego" to the DAPC and therefore "assumed
the use of the assets and former employees of the authority."
But Caryl Sumner Black, attorney for the Tourism Association, responded
in her Motion to Dismiss that "in actuality ... the Association Board
of Directors assumed nothing."
The association has no ownership of the facilities or assets, she said,
and "there is no unity of membership between the association and authority."
Instead, Sumner Black said, the Tourism Association is merely leasing the
venues from the city and has initiated a number of new policies and procedures
for their operation.
As of last week, the Development Authority had yet to file a response to
the suit, according to records at the Fayette County Courthouse.
A hearing on the Motions to Dismiss had been scheduled for Nov. 5 by Superior
Court Judge Paschal English, but Meeker said it will likely be continued
until December.
Meanwhile, the city has filed a response to another suit brought against
it in September by Group VI Corp. and Foley Designs claiming breach of contract
for nearly a quarter million dollars in unpaid change orders related to the
Tennis Center expansion.
The suit alleges that they together are owed nearly $229,000 for unpaid
expenses that were not part of the original $2.2 million contract with the
Development Authority to expand the Tennis Center.
In the response, Meeker denies most of the claims made in the lawsuit and
again argues that the Development Authority's former executive director
was acting independently and without the knowledge of the city in approving
the various change orders.
Meeker said a Motion to Dismiss the case was likely to be filed at a later
date as well.







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…