As expected, an out-of-county
judge will rule over the lawsuit between the Fayette County Commission
and Sheriff Randall Johnson over the housing of prisoners arrested by
the county-commission-supervised marshal's department.
All four of Fayette's
Superior Court judges have recused themselves from the suit filed by the
county, which alleges Johnson is improperly turning away prisoners arrested
of the commissioners.
Chief Judge Paschal A. English
Jr. and Judges Johnnie L. Caldwell Jr., Christopher C. Edwards and Tommy
R. Hankinson signed a joint recusal order dated Dec. 30.
Senior Superior Court Judge
William Isom has agreed to hear the case, with a hearing slated for Tuesday,
Jan. 20. Isom is the former chief judge of the neighboring Clayton Judicial
Circuit.
The commission is petitioning
the court for a temporary injunction and permanent order to force Johnson
to accept prisoners arrested by marshals. The county is also seeking a
mandamus, which orders a public agency or government body to perform an
act required by law which it has previously neglected or refused to do.
Johnson, who operates the jail
as part of the sheriff's department, contends the marshal's
office is not a legal law enforcement agency and accepting prisoners into
the jail whom are arrested by marshals could expose himself and the county
to a "tremendous liability."
County officials argue that
the marshal's office is a full-fledged law enforcement agency. The
marshals, who are state-certified police officers, patrol county-owned
property for security purposes but occasionally they make traffic stops
if they witness a violation that could indicate a motorist is endangering
others, officials have said.
Johnson contends the marshal's
office cannot operate as a county police department because the county
did not seek voter approval through a referendum required by Georgia law.
County officials contend that the marshal's department became a law
enforcement agency before that law went into effect.
In August, Sheriff Johnson
warned the commission that he would no longer accept prisoners from the
marshal's office at the jail based on the liability concerns. Since
then, the jail accepted two prisoners from the marshal's office,
but both of those were on charges from other law enforcement agencies.
A marshal brought a prisoner
to the jail Dec. 21 on DUI and other traffic charges, but that prisoner
was refused by jail officials.
According to the suit, the
only reason a prisoner arrested on an indictable offense can be denied
housing by a jailer is if the prisoner "has not received medical
treatment for obvious physical injuries or conditions of an emergency
nature."
Failure to accept a prisoner
when warranted could lead to a misdemeanor charge with a fine of up to
$1,000, the suit indicated.







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…