Judi-ann Rutherford can keep
her job with the Fred Brown Jr. Amphitheater and still serve on the City
Council if elected in a Nov. 25 runoff, Peachtree City Attorney Ted Meeker
decided Wednesday.
The legal opinion was made
public Wednesday night during the first business meeting of the Peachtree
City Tourism Association, Inc., a new non-profit agency proposed by City
Manager Bernard McMullen that will take over operation of the amphitheater
and Peachtree City Tennis Center on Dec. 1.
"Tell everyone I'm
good to go," Post 1 candidate Rutherford declared after hearing the
news Wednesday night. "As I said all along, my conflict is very clear:
I am not a city employee."
Meeker agreed. In the legal
opinion requested by McMullen, Meeker wrote, "My understanding is
that employees of the Development Authority of Peachtree City will not
become city employees, but will rather become employees of the Peachtree
City Tourism Association, a non-profit entity."
That distinction was important,
Meeker noted, because there was no question about Rutherford's ability
to run for City Council prior to Sept. 25, when the Development Authority
announced it was returning management of the amphitheater and tennis center
to City Hall.
It got slightly more complicated
two weeks ago when McMullen proposed creation of the Tourism Association
and proposed seating himself, two city councilmen, the city finance director
and recreation commission chairman as its first board of directors.
Meeker came to his conclusion
after reviewing the Georgia Constitution, the Official Code of Georgia
and the city charter.
"The law historically
favors the rights of an average citizen to run for public office, in spite
of the potential for conflict," said Meeker. If conflict does arise,
it should be dealt with, he said, but the potential for conflict shouldn't
be cause not to seek public office.
Rutherford has maintained all
along that as long as a independent, non-profit agency removed from city
government were managing the amphitheater, she would have no conflict.
She will not be able to serve on the tourism board, nor vote on matters
related to appointments to the tourism board. She'll also abstain
from decisions regarding distribution of the city's hotel-motel tax,
which helps fund the operation of the venues.
"There is no legal reason
why Ms. Rutherford cannot run for and hold the office of council member
while at the same time being employed by the non-profit association,"
Meeker concluded.
Rutherford came within 20 votes
of winning a majority in the Nov. 4 election for Post 1. She and the second-place
vote-getter, Lee H. Poolman, will face off again in a runoff on Tuesday,
Nov. 25.
Poolman has urged Rutherford
to drop out of the race in the days since then, arguing it would save
the taxpayers the expense of a runoff.
Poolman did not attend Wednesday's
tourism association meeting and could not be reached for comment on Thursday.







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…