The two outgoing members of
the Peachtree City Council have vowed not to return as long as action
relative to the new Tourism Association remains on the council's
agend.
Annie McMenamin and Dan Tennant
agreed to stay away from Thursday night's meeting, which was canceled
at 7:15 p.m. due to lack of a quorum. As a result, the entire Tourism
Association proposal may be shelved just days before it was to become
reality.
"We're being held
hostage by two lame ducks," declared Mayor Steve Brown as he apologized
to a puzzled crowd of residents Thursday.
McMenamin and Tennant, who
leave office after Jan. 1, say fellow councilmen Steve Rapson and Murray
Weed have locked them out of any voice or vote on matters concerning the
tourism group, which was on track to take over operations of the Fred
Brown Jr. Amphitheater and Peachtree City Tennis Center on Dec. 1.
Rapson is chairman of the tourism
board, while Weed is vice-chairman. City Manager Bernard McMullen also
sits on the panel, as does City Finance Director Paul Salvatore and Recreation
Commission Chairman David Ring.
That mix of appointees, McMullen's
suggestion, "presents an ethical dilemma" write McMenamin and
Tennant in a letter hand-delivered to the city manager on Thursday afternoon,
just three hours before the scheduled start orf the meeting.
McMullen, who has invested
countless hours into forging the Tourism Association plan to run the facilities,
tried to talk the councilmembers out of their decision, but to no avail.
"We have concluded that
since three members of council have apparently already decided what is
going to happen, that our only ethical recourse is to refuse to attend
any meetings that contain agenda items relative to the Tourism Association,"
says the letter from the Post 1 and Post 2 representatives, who also questioned
the legalities of the tourism board's non-profit and tax-exempt status.
"We cannot in good conscience
be a part of a process where there is even a hint of impropriety,"
reads the letter.
McMenamin elaborated when reached
at home Thursday evening.
"They're asking us
to enter into a contractual agreement with something that is just not
there, and something that is a non-profit organization at that, which
is questionable." she said.
Rapson was clearly angered
letter, he wrote:
"The two council members
have refused to attend any public meeting where the Tourism Association
is an agenda item," he said. "This appears to us to be political
blackmail, pure and simple."
Approval of a management contract
between the council and tourism association was among the pressing items
scheduled Thursday's meeting, along with adoption of 2004 budgets
for both venues that put them in the black by year's end.
"You show up at council
meetings because that's what you're elected to do," said
Rapson. "It's your job."
"The ramifications of
their decision" are great, Rapson said, suggesting that McMullen
has three options if the Tourism Association idea falls through: Shut
the venues down, try to run them with city employees, or call for a city
council special meeting to address city business without the Tourism issue
hanging over it.
McMullen was enroute to Colorado
on city business and unavailable for comment Friday, but Public Information
Specialist Betsy Tyler said alternatives to the tourism association were
already in the works just in case.
Back
to News Home Page |







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…