Health insurance
On Thursday, with my strong
support, the House of Representatives passed the Small Business Health
Fairness Act of 2003 (H.R. 660) in a 262 to 162 vote.
Over the course of my years
in Congress, I have heard from a wide range of small business owners who
are unable to afford health coverage for their employees. Having operated
my own small business for over 40 years, I know, from personal experience,
how costly it can be to provide health insurance coverage.
While the current system provides
incentives for large multi-state corporations to purchase insurance through
employer-based plans for their employees, these same incentives do not
exist for small business owners and self-employed individuals. As a result,
the self-employed, small business owners, and small business employees
do not have adequate access to health care coverage. In fact, over 60
percent of the uninsured either own or work for a small business.
It is for this reason that
I offered my support as an original cosponsor of this bill when it was
introduced earlier this year. This bill would address this inequity by
allowing small businesses and the self-employed to combine their resources
with other businesses and individuals as members of associations.
these Americans would be able to obtain coverage from Association Health
Plans (AHPs). AHPs have been estimated to reduce insurance costs by 15
to 30 percent by allowing small businesses to join together so they can
obtain the same economies of scale, purchasing clout, and administrative
efficiencies now available to large employer and union health plans.
Long-term care
[Also last] week, I was proud
to offer my support as a cosponsor of the Long-Term Care and Retirement
Security Act of 2003 (H.R. 2096).
This legislation would provide
a tax deduction for premiums for long-term care insurance and make it
easier for more Americans to plan and save for their future long-term
care needs.
In addition to providing a
deduction for premiums, the bill would enable employers to offer long-term
care insurance policies through employer-sponsored cafeteria plans and
flexible spending accounts. As a result, more Americans will be able to
know that, should they need long-term care in their later years, they
will have the coverage they need.
WMD claims
I spent a good portion of last
week in hearings for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
The committee has been investigating intelligence provided by the White
House and the Central Intelligence Agency which clearly shows that the
administration operated in good faith with the American people in using
military force in Iraq.
While much of what we have
discussed is classified, I can tell you that the evidence I have seen
in the committee clearly convinces me that Saddam Hussein was in possession
of chemical and biological weapons, was working on obtaining nuclear weapons,
and took elaborate steps to conceal the possession of these weapons of
mass destruction from the international community and the United Nations
weapons inspectors.
Iraq is a nation roughly the
size of the state of California, and is inhabited by more than 24 million
people. A small amount of these chemical and biological agents can potentially
kill thousands or even millions. We are not talking about large warehouses
full of agents, but a quantity equal to three tanker trucks, like those
used to haul milk or gasoline we see on the roads each day.
When we put it into perspective,
it is easy to see why we haven't found what the media call, "the
smoking gun."
Very few people were permitted
to know where these weapons were moved, and the very few records that
existed have been destroyed either by the Saddam regime, in the bombing
campaign, or in the subsequent looting of Iraqi military offices.
But, based upon the unprecedented
access given to the Committee by the CIA, I am strongly convinced that
the President was truthful in claiming that Saddam Hussein had illicit
weapons of mass destruction, was capable of using them, and needed to
be dealt with immediately.
Disabled vets pay
On Thursday, I became a cosponsor
of HR 303, the Retired Pay Restoration Act. HR 303 will permit retired
members of the armed forces who have a service connected disability to
receive both military retired pay, by reason of their years of military
service, and disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs.
I was a cosponsor of this legislation
in the 107th Congress and through my membership on the Budget Committee,
the U.S. Congress was able to provide funding to overturn a 111-year-old
law which prohibited receipt of both military retirement and Department
of Veterans Affairs disability benefits for certain qualified veterans.
I will continue to be active
in the debate to provide just compensation for our nation's disabled veterans.
As a proud veteran of the Army National Guard, I understand the sacrifices
that our veterans have made. Addressing issues that affect veterans and
servicemen and women is one of my top priorities. I know that our freedom
would not be a possibility without the prior service of veterans and our
brave armed forces stationed around the world today.
Asbestos funds
[Last week] I introduced legislation
to preserve funds to pay victims of asbestos. There are currently hundreds
of thousands of individuals who have asbestos-related illnesses. Once
a common material used in fireproofing, it was later determined that exposure
to asbestos was a significant factor for the development of cancer and
other illnesses.
Under current tax law, funds
established to pay claimants are taxed at the corporate rate. This diverts
money from the funds that should go to those adversely impacted by exposure
to asbestos. Secondly, because many of these companies are facing bankruptcy,
the number of contributors to the funds is dwindling. This places a larger
burden on the remaining companies to pay claims, causing a domino effect
on the number of businesses which are closing their doors. This threatens
the ability to pay those who have legitimate asbestos-related claims.
The legislation I offered provides
tax reforms on investments made by claim funds, exempting the investments
made by the fund from paying taxes and leaving that money in the fund
to be paid to claimants. It also offers tax changes to the companies as
they emerge from bankruptcy, so that they can continue to be viable.
Not only does this increase
the number of companies contributing to the claim funds, it allows the
companies to restructure and continue to be viable employers and taxpayers.
It is important that these companies, who no longer make this dangerous
product, be allowed to emerge from bankruptcy so that those who have become
ill may receive the settlements they deserve.
Family violence act
Last week, with my strong support,
the House of Representatives passed the conference report for the Keeping
Children and Families Safe Act of 2003 (S. 342) in a 421 to 3 vote.
Passage of this legislation
continues to support efforts to prevent child abuse and family violence
before it occurs.
Among its provisions, S. 342
continues to promote partnerships between child protective services and
private and community-based organizations, including education, health,
and mental health systems. Through these partnerships, families and children
receive important child abuse and neglect prevention and treatment services.
In addition, the bill requires
the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study on the effectiveness
of citizen review panels, which provide an evaluation of state and local
child protection activities. These panels are comprised of volunteer community
representatives who understand the needs of their local communities.






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…