Long-simmering frustrations
about the direction of the city and the performance of Mayor Steve Brown
reached a boiling point for two members of the Peachtree City Council
last week, who stated their lack of confidence in his abilities to lead
and suggested his actions are damaging the reputation of the city.
At the same time, the other
two councilmen voiced support for Brown, and especially his criticism
of the county Chamber of Commerce for scheduling a meeting of invited
elected officials that by design circumvents the state's open meetings
law.
On one side are councilmen
Dan Tennant and Annie McMenamin, who say they welcome the opportunity
to get together with elected officers from other municipalities and will
attend the meeting, set for Friday morning at the old courthouse in Fayetteville,
now the home of the Chamber.
On the other side are councilmen
Murray Weed and Steve Rapson, who rejected the invitation to attend the
Government Liaison Committee meetings and side with Brown in charging
that the Chamber has intentionally designed the guest list to avoid having
to open it to the public or media.
All four are passionate about
their positions, particularly in regards to Brown and his frequent charges
of malfeasance in local government.
"Steve Brown is destroying
the very fabric of this city," said McMenamin, a 13-year veteran
of the council who retires in December. "He's hurting the city in
so many ways. He's hurting business, development, industry."
Added Tennant, "Steve
Brown is not a leader. Leaders build consensus, Steve divides."
Rapson had a different opinion:
"If you go back over the course of the last year that Steve Brown
has been in office and look at the votes that were tied, 90 percent of
them were related to the Development Authority."
Said Weed, an attorney known
for going by the book at council meetings, "I can not participate
in any event knowing that its purpose is to circumvent the Sunshine Law,
and I support Mayor Brown's stand on the issue."
The disagreement has stirred
a flurry of letter writing. Both Rapson and Brown's responses were forwarded
to The Citizen and printed last week, alongside the invitation penned
This week, Tennant wrote a
rebuttal and acceptance. It appears today on Page 5A.
Chamber officials were mostly
silent about their intentions, but Chairman Jim Pace expressed regret
for the language of the invitation last week. It was not known who else
planned to attend.
Both Tennant, who is up for
relection this fall, and Brown admit their relationship is strained. Tennant
contributed to Brown's campaign in 2001, but both men now say they seldom
see eye to eye. When Brown went out of town last week and missed a council
meeting, Tennant as mayor pro tem amended the agenda to add discussion
regarding the Development Authority's finances, an issue Brown has been
pursuing for months.
"I wanted to let everybody
know that this wasn't sitting dormant," Tennant said, referring to
efforts to eliminate the authority's debt.
Brown replied on Tuesday, "I
was really disappointed that Dan would bring up the Tennis Center overage
when he knew that I was not there. But that's Dan. He's kind of moving
out on his own agenda."
Agendas are alleged in both
camps.
"The Chamber made an effort
to get us all together and then Steve Brown goes and makes a mess of it,"
said Tennant. "I supported him in the election, but as soon as he
took office his agenda changed. His personal agenda now is to save the
city."
Brown said, "Dan is heading
in another direction. He has changed his platform 180 degrees, and it
is sad to me. I go to meetings and speaking engagements and I constantly
have people ask me, 'What's going on with Dan Tennant? And I don't know."
McMenamin offered a similar,
though opposite, assessment: "When your legislative body in Atlanta
meets with local people, the first thing they ask is, 'What's happened
to Peachtree City?' This community used to be the very envy, the pride
and joy for the rest of the state. We are no longer."
Back
to News Home Page |







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…