Claiming the Development Authority
of Peachtree City has been fiscally irresponsible, Mayor Steve Brown is
calling for all seven authority members and its executive director to
resign.
Brown cited "massive"
cost overruns on the recent tennis center expansion project which he calculates
at over $450,000, the authority's failure to help fund the hotel-motel
tax shortfall and its use of a bank loan to fund operating expenses such
as payroll.
Brown also said if the situation
isn't resolved he may ask the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate
the matter, although he considers that "a last resort"; instead
he wants to create a recreation authority to take over the tennis center
and amphitheater operations.
Development authority executive
director Virgil Christian, who oversaw the day-to-day construction of
the tennis center expansion, said the cost overruns on the project actually
total $287,000 and most of the changes couldn't be avoided. The cost overruns
include $25,000 for overages on the construction of the covered tennis
courts and $23,000 to the architect of the project, Christian said.
"They were specifically
told adamantly to stay within the $2.5 million budget," for the expansion,
Brown said Tuesday morning. "And then we find out they're using debt
funding to do it. ... This is not what I would call a well-oiled machine."
Development authority Chairman
Tate Godfrey pointed out that the authority offered to participate in
the anticipated hotel-motel tax shortfall with an agreement it presented
to council earlier this year but council declined to authorize the agreement.
Godfrey also defended the authority's
use of a loan to meet payroll obligations since its income from operating
the tennis center and amphitheater are seasonal. The loan will be repaid
in the coming months once more revenues are available, he said.
Those debts are temporary "just
because we don't have the same cash flow each month," he added.
Christian said the changes
that brought the tennis center expansion over budget were necessary, including
changes to the parking area, a new electrical distribution panel, new
wiring for lighting fixtures (the fixtures were donated by Cooper Lighting)
and upgrading the electrical and HVAC system to accommodate a restaurant
on the second floor of the office/pro shop building.
Although Brown contends the
development authority needed city permission for the increased costs,
Christian contends the development authority was the entity that contracted
with Group VI and other subcontractors for construction of the expansion,
and the authority decided to use a loan to fund the cost overruns.
"I'm proud of the product
I have delivered to the citizens of Peachtree City," Christian said,
adding that he wishes the project would have stayed under its original
budget of $2.5 million. The building will probably be appraised at over
$3.5 million once an appraisal is conducted, Christian said.
Group VI, the contractor for
the project, worked with the authority to provide improvements not in
the contract which helped add value to the project, Christian said.
Christian noted that he kept
council members up to date on the project monthly via e-mail and he was
glad to answer any questions about the project.
Brown has also called the authority's
loans "illegal" but he will commit to having the city pay off
the loans, which total over $1.45 million.
Godfrey contends the loans
are legal and that previous city councils were aware of the loans and
the authority's financial status. That information was also shared with
the council committee that helped hammer out the recently-approved intergovernmental
agreement between the authority and council, Godfrey said.
"We were going to get
that all paid off eventually," by using long-term financing Godfrey
said.
A recent full audit of the
authority listed all the loans it had outstanding and that information
was also shared with the City Council, Godfrey added.
"It documented in the
report that the loans were legal," Godfrey said. "If they were
illegal, why didn't the auditors bring it up before now?"
Although the authority doesn't
"like" to be in debt, that was one of the reasons the authority
was asked by the council in 1993 to run the tennis center and amphitheater,
Godfrey said, "because we could take risks that the council couldn't."
One such example is taking
out a loan several months in advance so deposits could be paid for artists
in the amphitheater's summer concert series, Godfrey said. The loans were
repaid once the amphitheater got its revenue for ticket sales, Godfrey
added.
"They didn't have the
resources to do that," Godfrey said.
Godfrey also pointed to one
occasion several years ago when the city council directed the authority
to borrow funds to make improvements to the amphitheater as the city council
agreed to fund the second phase of the tennis center to add a number of
clay courts to the facility.
Brown wants a new recreation
authority to operate the tennis center and amphitheater, which the development
authority has done since 1993.
"That way they can be
run in a more cost-efficient manner and leave economic development to
the development authority," Brown said.
He floated a similar concept
to city council earlier this year, but it was ultimately voted down in
favor of keeping the current arrangement with the venues operated by the
development authority.
A recreation authority could
issue tax free revenue bonds at better rates than the authority is currently
getting, Brown said.
"The big problem is figuring
out how to pay all that debt service," Brown said.
Brown said he will commit to
having the city pay off the development authority's debt. The city has
been advised the only legal way for the city to issue revenue bonds to
cover the debt with long-term payments would be through creating a new
recreation authority, Brown said.
"I am fully in favor of
paying all the authority's outstanding debt ..." Brown said.
Current and former authority
members strongly dispute Brown's allegations, about authority loans, saying
everything has been done legally, above board and in the open, and with
approval from the previous city councils.
The current council has agreed
to take on the authority's debt, providing the city gets an appropriate
line-item listing of what the debts were incurred for. In exchange, the
council will dramatically cut the amount of hotel-motel tax funds the
authority receives from the city.
Brown has also questioned what
collateral was used to secure the loans since the city owns the tennis
center and amphitheater buildings, not the authority.
Godfrey said the loans were
approved by the banks based on last year's agreement with the city that
guaranteed $265,000 a year of hotel-motel tax revenues to the authority
for the next 15 years. The banks also calculated in the sponsorship and
membership commitments the authority received as revenues for the tennis
center and amphitheater, Godfrey said.
While Brown has concerns some
of the authority's loans were being paid on an interest-only basis that
stood to benefit the banks, Godfrey said the authority only makes interest-only
payments on a temporary basis until they can afford to resume principal
payments or combine loans with terms more favorable to the authority.
Former longtime authority members
Bob Truitt and Jim Fulton said the city council asked the authority to
operate the venues back in 1993 specifically because it could take more
"risks" by seeking loans such as those used to pay deposits
for acts coming to the amphitheater's summer concert series. The authority
could also seek sponsors for the amphitheater and tennis center whereas
the city council could not, said Fulton, who along with Truitt served
on the authority for over 20 years.
If any of the loans were illegal,
they would have been reported to a number of authorities including the
city council and bank examiners, Truitt said.
"They (the city council)
told us to run it like a business," Fulton said, adding that doing
so involves borrowing money for the business to grow.
In addition, there were several
occasions when the council would ask the authority to use loans to pay
for improvements to the amphitheater, Truitt said. One occasion involved
work on the cast house area of the amphitheater and another was for a
project to add new lighting and a catwalk to the amphitheater, Truitt
and Fulton said.
In both instances, council
told the authority to seek a loan to fund part or all of the projects,
Truitt said.
When the authority sought lines
of credit and other loans for projects and operating expenses, they got
"very competitive interest rates" Fulton said, giving credit
to the late Tom Farr, another longtime authority member who helped engineer
many of the loans through his employer, Peachtree National Bank.
"They were favorable rates
and favorable terms," Truitt said.
Money earned from the projects
was always put back into the venues for improvements, particularly in
the amphitheater's case, Fulton said.
Truitt said he thought the
tennis center and amphitheater combined, which are both owned by the city,
would have a value between $7 and $10 million.
"In the 20-plus years
I served on the authority, nobody on the development authority or airport
authority ever did anything that wasn't in the best interest of the city,"
Truitt said. Although he admitted some mistakes were made, "nobody
ever did anything maliciously."
"We didn't have time to
develop a conspiracy," Truitt said.
And though sometimes there
were disagreements with elected officials on the best course of action
to take, the dispute was always worked out, Fulton said.
"We just figured out the
right way to do it," Fulton said. "It was never 'I win, you
lose.'"
Fulton and Truitt said the
authority initially resisted council's request for them to manage the
amphitheater and oversee construction and management of the tennis center,
which at the time didn't exist.
The amphitheater, which needed
numerous construction improvements, was being managed by volunteers previously
but the authority turned it into a venue that brings in nationally-recognized
performing artists, Fulton noted.
"The volunteers did the
best they could, but they didn't have a $200,000 check to hire acts,"
Truitt said.
Truitt pointed out that the
venues are supported with funding from the hotel-motel tax, and each time
the tax was raised authority officials explained the projects to the local
hotel operators to get them on board.
"The idea that taxpayers
are having to pay more money than (council was) aware of is ludicrous,"
Fulton said.
The reduction in hotel-motel
tax funds the authority agreed to with the city council will require an
increase in ticket prices and court fees, Godfrey said. But with the new
covered courts, the tennis center is expected to boost revenues from lessons
and court fees that normally would have been cancelled due to rain.
There will also be a concentrated
effort to secure more sponsors for both the tennis center and amphitheater,
Godfrey said.
Godfrey said the authority
agreed to cut its funding from $300,000 to $265,000 with last year's council,
and although that "made it tough" the guaranteed money for 15
years allowed the authority to refinance its loans and pay it off in a
longer term, Godfrey said. The further cuts agreed to with this year's
council further hurts the authority's ability to repay its debt, which
is why the authority wants the city to take over paying the debt.
The authority and city have
agreed to cut the authority's hotel-motel tax funding next year from $265,000
to $180,000. The following year it would shrink to $140,000 with a goal
of reducing it to $100,000 the third year.
"It's going to be tough,
but we agreed to it," Godfrey said.
Fulton said the tennis center
and amphitheater were so successful because of the quality staff who operate
the facilities like Christian, who "has the contacts and the expertise."
Truitt said he also takes issue
with claims the authority did little for economic development in later
years. To lure the National Weather Service here, the authority purchased
land for the project to donate to the federal government, he said.
"That created 60 high-quality
jobs," Truitt said.
While the authority cannot
take all the credit, it has participated in luring a host of local businesses
that are located in the industrial park, Truitt added.
Back
to News Home Page |







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…