Perhaps Dr. Behe was totally

unfamiliar with the computer model that had revolutionized the explanation

of eye development four years earlier, but that seems incredibly unlikely.

And as Darwin himself wrote, "If it could be demonstrated that any

complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous,

successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down."

Third, the idea of intelligent

design is completely disregarded as being unscientific, and as such it

is unfactual and should be dismissed by our educational system. The truth

is that science is providing more and more evidence for creationism and

secular science is admitting this fact.

Astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle wrote

that "...a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as chemistry

and biology." Astrophysicist Paul Davies, who wrote the first book

ascribing the creation of the universe to a quantum fluctuation, concluded

in a later book, "The impression of design is overwhelming."

Chandra Wickramasinghe, director of the Cardiff Centre for Astrobiology,

wrote, "...one is driven to the conclusion, inescapably, that living

systems could not have been generated by random processes, within a finite

time-scale, in a finite universe."

Even the great physicist Stephen

Hawking wrote, "It would be very difficult to explain why the universe

should have begun in just this way, except as the act of a God who intended

to create beings just like us."

The point being, that even

though each of these scientists have actively written against the idea

of supernatural creation, they recognize that there is tremendous scientific

evidence for it. But no matter how strong the evidence, even when that

evidence is recognized, someone can still choose not to believe. In Bible-speak,

that is called free will.

There is so much scientific

data that contradicts Darwinism and its faith counterpart, naturalism,

(i.e., the Cambrian explosion, the creation of the universe, the creation

of first life, the fossil record, just to name a few) I believe that the

intellectual integrity of the scientific community will inescapably lead

to the introduction of intelligent design and elimination of Darwinism

from our high school and college curriculums within 10 years.

Pepper Adams

[email protected]