The proposed southside master
plan for Fayetteville is back at the drawing board, and a whole new team
of artists is elbowing its way to the canvas.
After tabling an annexation
and rezoning request until December, the City Council has directed staff
to create a special task force made up of local residents, developers
and city officials to study the matter.
Urban Collage, an Atlanta consulting
firm, has been conducting interviews with various members of the task
force in preparation for the first meeting, set for next Wednesday, Oct.
16, at 5 p.m. at the Depot.
Recent actions leading up to
the formation of the task force have been motivated in no small part by
the enthusiastic participation of residents on the southern tip of Fayetteville,
many of whom came out in strong opposition to the proposed master plan
in fear that it would create a "Pavilion South," a mega-retail
complex similar to the Fayette Pavilion on the city's north side, only
this one would be at their back door.
The creators of the master
plan have proposed a multiuse development comprising as much as almost
400 acres, depending upon how many of the property owners are involved
at any given time. In addition to various retail, office and residential
components, the long-term plan called for designated open space and the
eventual extension of the Ga. Highway 92 connector from Jimmie Mayfield
Boulevard to Jeff Davis Drive, a move the developers said would greatly
reduce traffic through the Fayetteville square by allowing Jeff Davis
area residents better access to Fayetteville Towne Center and other retail
destinations.
An important portion of the
overall site is a tract of about 53 acres just off the northeast corner
of hwys. 85 and 92, behind GTO's and Walgreen's. That land is in unincorporated
Fayette County, although it is nearly an island surrounded by city property.
Developers have proposed putting a shopping center, anchored by a Publix
supermarket, and other office and residential uses on that site.
That proposal got many local
residents, specifically in the Kingswood and Chanticleer subdivisions
just outside the city limits on Hwy 92, on full alert. Charging that the
retail components of the master plan would lead to major traffic problems
and increased crime, among other problems, many of these residents let
their opposition to the plan be known at several City Council meetings.
The council voted last month to table the annexation and rezoning request
until Dec. 5.
Another tract of concern to
local residents is adjacent to Kingswood, on the south side of the Hwy.
92 connector. That land is currently zoned for townhomes, but proponents
of the southside master plan petitioned the city for rezoning to commercial.
A tract on the east side of Jimmie Mayfield, next to the path of the proposed
road extension, is also part of a commercial rezoning request.
The task force is an unusually
large group, consisting of members of a number of families with interests
in the land included in the master plan. Also involved are members of
the City Council and city staff, along with representatives of the Kingswood,
Chanticleer, Highland Park, Lakemont, Woodgate and Wyngate subdivisions.
The driving force behind the
proposed master plan, at least at the council meetings, has been a three-man
team consisting of local developer Bob Rolader, whose family is one of
the land owners, along with Kent Rose and Rich Dippilito of Concordia
Properties. All three are on the task force.
Rolader would not comment on
the upcoming proceedings and where they might lead. "I have no idea
where this is going," he said. Efforts to reach Rose and Dippolito
for comment were unsuccessful.
Mayor Kenneth Steele and Councilman
Bill Talley have been designated to represent the City Council on the
task force, and Talley is impressed by the way the group has taken shape.
"I'm very glad the community
is getting involved," he said. "Sometimes these kinds of things
can take a life of their own."
Talley said that he has gotten
a lot of positive feedback from Kingswood residents and others with regard
to the formation of the task force. He also believes that the consultants
will provide a great deal of help by showing all of the participants what
alternatives are available.
Since the master plan was first
proposed more than a year ago, some city officials have suggested that
having the entire area under a single plan would allow the city to better
control the level of development. That philosophy could figure into the
council's eventual decision whether to annex the unincorporated portion
of the plan, although Talley stressed that the need for annexation has
not yet been established.
"I think the city's development
standards are a little higher and tougher than the county's," said
Talley. "We could have a little more control [if annexed]. But I'm
not looking to expand the city. We've got plenty to say grace over right
now."
Some residents think that the
city has plenty to handle right now and should reject what they believe
is "gross overdevelopment." That phrase was at the top of a
flier circulated throughout the various neighborhoods and a key topic
of discussion at a residents' meeting last week at the library.
The first line of the flier
read, "South Fayetteville Pavilion coming?" Concerns about declining
property values, the lack of state action in widening the highways south
of Fayetteville, possible septic problems stemming from new development,
more density and further school crowding, noise, crime all of these topics
were mentioned as possible results of the proposed "Pavilion South"
plan, as some residents are calling it.
"There's a lot of emotion
involved," said task force member Gina Mosley, a Wyngate resident
who attended the library meeting. "Whenever there's change, there's
a lot of reluctance."
But Mosley added that she is
encouraged by the "tremendous" amount of citizen involvement
this issue has generated, and she is pleased with the City Council's current
approach. Residents are concerned about a traffic situation that is already
a problem on Hwy. 92, and the new jail/courthouse complex opening soon
is a concern as well, although no one is sure how it will affect the area.
But she thinks everyone can
work together and find a solution all can live with. "Not everybody
will be happy," she said. "There will have to be some compromi se
involved. All of the stakeholders should be open to that."
Steele sees the process simply
as a way to "come up with something better" than what is there
now. Most of the city zoning has been in place since the 1980s, and realignment
of the highways on the south side of town have impacted the zoning somewhat,
he said.
"There are no easy answers,"
said Steele. "It's going to take an open mind. But it's worth the
effort."
As for the unincorporated tract,
Steele said the current county zoning (A-R, or agricultural-residential)
is probably not appropriate, given what surrounds the property. But he
feels no compulsion to annex it, and determining that is part of the task
force process.
Steele is very encouraged by
the participation of the residents, and how they have already shown a
desire to learn as much as they can from city staff and other experts
about what is going on. He welcomes constructive ideas and possible solutions
from all comers.
As Talley pointed out, there
is plenty of work to be done, and a decision is far from being made.
"I am in no way, shape,
or form committed one way or the other," he said. "Let's see
how it turns out."
Back
to News Home Page |







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…