The fact is that 66 percent

of Golfview residents are opposed to the measures taken on Golfview.

I am not including any streets outside the Golfview loop in this statistic.

The city requirement was for a 2/3 majority to be in favor. Since this

criterion was not met, the question that begs to be asked is, "How

did traffic calming get started?"

The fact is that more than

97 percent of drivers were clocked at 34 mph or slower on Golfview by

police studies. This was not a small sample. It included 10 days and over

5,700 separate readings. City requirements are that at least 15 percent

of drivers be clocked at 40 mph or faster for traffic calming. Since this

criterion was not met, the question begs to be asked, "How did traffic

calming get started?"

The fact is that there have

only been three accidents on Golfview in the past three years that were

in areas not already controlled by stop signs. City criteria require at

least five accidents per year. Since this criterion was not met, the question

that again begs to be asked is, "How did traffic calming get started?"

I readily acknowledge that

the people on one stretch of Golfview are affected by the poor visibility

of the hill. However, the solution is to improve visibility, not to put

37 signs, four speed humps, and a speed limit of 20 mph on a one-mile

stretch of road. By the way, a speed limit of 20 mph is actually illegal

in Georgia (OCGA 40-6-183). Another fact conveniently ignored.

What might improve visibility?

How about parabolic mirrors on top of the hill? There are also systems

that cause a light to flash when a car is approaching. Both of these options

would give those residents the enhanced visibility they desire without

constricting the flow of traffic, increasing pollution and slowing down

emergency vehicle response times. As an aside, most studies suggest that

slower emergency vehicle response times kill about 37 times as many people

as do car-pedestrian accidents.

Lets look at the facts: The

city was wrong to institute illegal speed limits and to introduce unwarranted

traffic calming. They didn't even meet their own criteria! Since the city's

own criteria were not met, the question is why did it ever even come up

for a vote?

John Henahan

Peachtree City

Back

to the Opinion Home Page | Back

to the top of the page