These remarks seem to indicate
that Mr. Mallet and the county water department are still not considering
all alternative methods. What about a mechanical clamshell bucket technique
from a barge? The advantage of this method is that dredged silt can be
loaded into transport barges then unloaded into lined trucks and hauled
to a final disposal area.
It's extremely cost efficient
because dredging costs are calculated by the amount of cubic yards removed,
not by an hourly dollar cost as charged by many "pumping" companies.
Piling it up and letting it
dry out may be a great way to do it on extremely large river projects
where there is a lot more maneuverability with conventional pumping equipment,
but not necessarily in Lake Peachtree.
This project has delayed because
of decisions about what to do with the silt. The silt removal method I'm
referring to minimizes disturbance to the lake shore and surrounding property
because it only requires one access point to the lake and silt is then
hauled away. This type of dredging has been used on all the lakes of Callaway
Gardens, the large lake at Stone Mountain, Lake Lanier for the city of
Atlanta, St. Ives Country Club lakes in Duluth, and more recently, the
city of Palmetto reservoir.
As with Lake Peachtree there
was no suitable place to pile up the silt and let it dry out. There was
no "pump this stuff out and let it dry out" situation. For your
reference, the Palmetto reservoir dredging cost was $200,000 to remove
and haul off 10,000 cubic yards. So, it's reasonable to expect that the
cost for Lake Peachtree should be under $500,000.
Finding a solution to this
dredging process seems to be a colossal undertaking between the Water
Department and Peachtree City. In my opinion, with a little more research
as was done by the Palmetto City engineers, we wouldn't have all this
continuing endless discussion.
The one bright spot about this
ongoing process is that the county has considered an alternative method
to dredging. The $1.4 million spent in 1986 to drain and excavate thousands
of cubic yards of silt from one end of Lake Peachtree to build an island,
which in itself displaces a significant amount of usable water, was a
complete debacle.
Finally, Peachtree City has
to be careful if they do decide to "pile" up the silt next to
City Hall. You shouldn't put it on a flood plain, and, you can't place
the fill in any surrounding wetland areas as this would violate Section
404 of the Clean Water Act.
Scott Powell
Peachtree City






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…