A court-appointed
mediator may be juggling his first hot potato soon after he opens discussion
of a tax equity dispute between Fayette County and its cities.
County and
city leaders are on opposite sides and equally adamant in their views
concerning discussing city use of the County Jail as part of the overall
tax equity discussion.
In a letter
to the cities last week, the county says it will begin Jan. 1 charging
the cities $43.70 per prisoner per day to house municipal prisoners.
A 1993 agreement
allows municipal court prisoners to be housed in the county jail at no
charge, but that agreement expires at the end of this month. City leaders
have asked the county to extend that agreement for 180 days so the issue
can be discussed during the tax equity discussions.
"We're
not going to extend it or discuss it in the tax equity debate," said
County Commission Chairman Greg Dunn this week.
"It will
be included" in the discussions, Fayetteville Mayor Kenneth Steele
countered.
The overall
discussion revolves around how much residents of Fayetteville, Peachtree
City and Tyrone pay in taxes for various county services like the county
library, the Sheriff's Department and Public Works and whether they receive
as much in services as they are paying in taxes.
City leaders
contend that their residents pay about $2 million a year for services
that go to residents of the unincorporated areas of the county, something
that's forbidden by state law. County leaders say city residents receive
everything they pay for and more.
At the close
of last year, the County Commission informed the cities that it would
nullify the 1993 agreement concerning the jail.
During talks
last month, Fayetteville and the county appeared to be close to reaching
a new compromise agreement, but after consulting with leaders in Peachtree
City and Tyrone, Fayetteville decided the matter should be part of the
tax equity talks.
"The jail
is a county-wide service as acknowledged in the service delivery strategy,"
said Steele. The service delivery strategy is a cooperative agreement
between the county and cities for delivery of services to local residents.
It's required by state law and approved by the state Department of Community
Affairs.
Dunn said the
per diem fees the county wants to charge would be covered by fines and
court fees, not by taxes. "We don't get tax money from them to do
this," he said.
"The taxpayers
pay for the services," argued Steele. "We would have to raise
property taxes about three quarters of a mill to pay for [the fees],"
he added. That would be a 30 percent increase.
Both men said
they are hopeful that, despite the sharp disagreements, the mediation
will result in solutions that all can live with.
"We're
going to discuss all legitimate concerns that need to be discussed, and
I hope they'll be resolved," said Steele.







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…