A request for
a commercial rezoning at the entrance to Wynnmeade subdivision off Ga.
Highway 54 is temporarily on hold.
The parcel
in question, 3.16 acres to the eastern side of Wynnmeade Parkway, is currently
zoned residential. But the property is undeveloped and Piedmont Properties
wants the entire site rezoned for commercial use.
When the city's
land use plan was updated in 1995, it indicated that this parcel could
be considered for "special limited commercial purposes that would
not detract from the nearby residential subdivision." That concept
included a 50-foot buffer from Wynnmeade Parkway and access to the parcel
via a frontage road. Such a road is now planned to extend off MacDuff
Parkway.
A public hearing
on the request was scheduled for Monday night's Planning Commission meeting.
But the applicant asked for it to be postponed to the commission's first
meeting in January.
Jim Williams,
the city's director of developmental services, recommended to the commission
in a memo that the rezoning be denied. But some issues could be resolved
if Wynnmeade residents can agree to a list of commercial uses that would
be mutually acceptable. If such a compromise could be reached, Piedmont
Properties could seek a limited use commercial rezoning instead of a general
commercial designation.
Williams also
indicated the parcel should not be connected to Hwy. 54 or Wynnmeade Parkway.
Piedmont Properties
is also developing the subdivision adjacent to the northern boundary of
Wynnmeade. When Piedmont officials began designing their plan, they approached
the city about trading land for a city park at the northern edge of Wynnmeade
so it could be developed as part of the new subdivision.
The land Piedmont
wants rezoned to commercial is part of that proposed trade transaction,
along with the parcel on the other side of Wynnmeade Parkway. But Marvin
Isenberg, president of Piedmont Properties, has told city officials that
he wants the land rezoned first before the trade goes through.
City Attorney
Rick Lindsey has indicated the city cannot trade land for zoning, according
to Williams's memo.
Williams also
contends that the portion of the property in question considered for the
swap with the city should retain its residential zoning.
Back
to News Home Page | Back
to the top of the page







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…