In the race for mayor I am

supporting Steve Brown. I think Steve has the talent and the ability to

provide the leadership that will be needed in the future. Some of the

candidates are attempting to paint Steve as the negative candidate. Not

true: Steve has only the best interest of Peachtree City in mind and has

the talent and energy to articulate his views.

Steve maintains his knowledge

current by attending ARC planning classes as well as having a strong background

in land use planning. I served on the Peachtree City Planning commission

for three years and Steve is the only mayoral candidate to appear at any

meeting. He was also the only candidate I ever saw in attendance at city

council meetings of the ones I attended.

[Mayoral candidate Dan] Lakly

has had his time and we now need fresh ideas. At the Rotary Forum [candidate

Gary] Rower indicated an elitist approach when discussing his position

the bond issues. He does not believe the citizens should even vote on

these bonds but leave it to the mayor and council.

Remember [Mayor Bob] "I

know more about Peachtree City than anyone" Lenox? It is puzzling

to me that the minute a person becomes a candidate he becomes smarter

than the voters. I don't think that is the type of leadership we want

or need again in Peachtree City. Mr. Rower is also pro-annexation which

means he is pro high density. That is a fact. [Candidate Frank] Murphy

seems to want to keep the status quo but has no ideas of how to finance

it.

For Council Post 3 I have a

small dilemma. Both [Nancy] Faulkner and [incumbent Steve] Rapson are

strong candidates with each having strengths in different areas.

I believe Ms. Faulkner has

an excellent knowledge of city operations including the budgetary, planning

and administrative functions. I believe Mr. Rapson has an excellent knowledge

of the financial process, the budgetary process as well as a good working

knowledge of the city's administrative system.

The one apprehension I have

concerning Mr. Rapson is the issue of nepotism concerning his wife. I

do not believe Mr. Rapson on his own would make any decisions contrary

to the best interest of the city; however, as his wife's position is under

the city manager he may at some time have to consider her interest.

Some people manage by leadership

and some even in this day still manage by fear and intimidation. I believe

either candidate will do an excellent job in Council Post 3.

For Council Post 4 I am supporting

Mr. Murray Wood. I believe his background and experience makes him the

right candidate at the right time for the right position. He will bring

to the council new and fresh ideas based on his previous employment and

his superior knowledge of intergovernmental relationships. He has firm

principles and ethics.

I believe Mrs. Fritz has to

run on her record. Let me just summarize [her] highlights: Voted to approve

big-box stores, voted for 1,500 new apartments, voted for a city charter

change (supposedly at her urging) which only served to benefit the city

manager and the city attorney. I saw no benefit to the citizens of Peachtree

City as a result of this charter manipulation. As stated at the Rotary

Club forum, she is pro-annexation and pro-high density as stated above

concerning Mr. Rower. Mrs. Fritz has to share the responsibility for the

daily two-to-three-mile traffic lines at Ga. highways 54 and 74.

In closing, I would be happy

to discuss issues or candidates with anyone desiring further conversation.

Let me again urge every citizen of Peachtree City to vote. The worse problem

we face in this great country is not fear but apathy.

Willis J. Granger

Peachtree City

Back

to Opinion Home Page |