And JOHN MUNFORD
Fayette residents may never
have heard of Mike Crotts, a Republican from Conyers, but many will get
to know him better if the state Senate's Reapportionment Committee has
its way.
If the committee's proposed
map of new state Senate districts is approved, Crotts will be the sitting
senator in a district that covers parts of six counties, including an
unincorporated portion of Fayette between Fayetteville and Starr's Mill.
"It's awful ... absolutely
awful," said state Rep. Kathy Cox of Peachtree City following Monday's
special session of the state Legislature. "I can't believe the audacity
of it."
Under the proposal, Fayette
would be carved up among three Senate districts. Peachtree City and Tyrone
would be in the 28th with most of Coweta County, while Brooks and Woolsey
would go into the 17th along with parts of Spalding, Henry, Newton, Rockdale
and Walton counties.
The 17th currently includes
Henry, Butts and parts of Newton and Rockdale counties. Crotts, a Republican,
was first elected in 1992 and has been reelected twice without opposition.
The 34th District would continue
to have a portion of north Fayette and western Clayton County with very
little change. It is currently represented by Greg Hecht of Jonesboro,
a member of the Reapportionment Committee.
Hecht voted along with 13 other
committee members in favor of the map, but said Monday he had objections
that he hopes will be ironed out as the full Senate debates the matter.
"I think you'll see a
lot of debate on the floor," he said, "probably this week. There
were some things that I wanted to try and change, and I spoke to some
of the people on the committee about them, and they said they didn't want
to change it but it could be changed later," Hecht said.
He didn't notice the size and
shape of the 17th District, Hecht said, but added it's not unusual for
a district to touch six counties. "There are some with nine,"
he said, but added that the 17th "may be a bad district which will
need revision."
Following the Senate session
Tuesday, Hecht said there was a lot of discussion among members, but no
floor debate on the proposed districts. That will come when the map is
introduced on the floor, he added. "When the map goes to the floor,
I'm sure there will be proposals for amendments, and we may see amendments
requested by members of both parties," he added.
He also predicted when the
districts are finally drawn, there will be lawsuits from individuals in
both parties.
Cox said that partisanship
in the proposed map is obvious.
"This is the definition
of gerrymandering," Cox said after viewing the proposed map for the
first time. "And Fayette's not the only district that will knock
your socks off."
Members of the Republican Caucus
complained that most of the Republican districts drawn by the committee
are pushing the maximum population limits allowed by law, limiting their
number, while Democratic districts are near and in some cases below the
minimum requirement, increasing their number.
Hecht said he isn't aware of
detailed population numbers on each district, but "I belive the districts
[as drawn] prserve most of the present legislative seats."
He also disagreed with Republican
criticisms that the proposed map violates the federal Voting Rights Act
members. The committee followed guidelines recently used by the Virginia
Legislature in redrawing its district, and the Virginia plan has been
approved by the U.S. Department of Justice, he said.
State Sen. Mitch Seabaugh,
who represents part of Fayette County, said he hopes his fellow legislators
can come together to develop a better map for the citizens of Georgia.
Seabaugh pointed out that 88
counties would be split by districts with the map approved by the committee,
while currently only 23 counties are split by districts.
"We should be trying to
keep counties whole," Seabaugh said. "... Or people won't know
who their state senator or state representative is."
One of the new districts created
stretches across 11 counties from north of Augusta all the way to Macon,
Seabaugh noted. That district, currently held by Joey Brush, was being
called a tourism district, Seabaugh said.
"How can a senator who
gets parts of 11 counties really be able to serve all those counties?"
Seabaugh said. "I know how difficult I find it just to serve three."
Seabaugh said the new map would
cause his district to lose the Fayetteville and Woolsey areas while gaining
a part of Tyrone and keeping Peachtree City and Brooks. While that isn't
ideal for Seabaugh, he admits that other Republican senators fared much
worse.
"There's no way that even
if I'm in the Democratic Party I would vote for it because of the way
it was drawn," Seabaugh said. "Not even all Democrats have had
an input into this map.
When the map vote was taken
Monday, the four Republicans on the redistricting committee voted against
it. The other 20 members of the committee are Democrats, but some of them
walked out or refused to vote.
Back
to News Home Page |







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…