County commissioners in Fulton
County and DeKalb County voted late last year to deny the extension of
funding for the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) well
into the second quarter of the 21st Century.
It is my belief that maybe
their "shared and stated principle" of denying this rapid transit
contract and assistance agreement pertaining to future rail expansion
alternatives and studies prior to transit funding mechanisms being "spread"
among additional political boundaries may have future validity.
But to take this approach without
further detailed examination and reassessment of the consequences demonstrates
a somewhat lack of concern for the future transportation needs of metro
Atlanta.
The primary issue is the extension
of the current contract, which provides federal matching assistance, from
2032 to 2047 not the funding formula for the system.
It also should be noted that
the city of Atlanta chose not to take any action on this matter last year.
In addition, it should be stated that some current elected officials in
Fulton County and DeKalb County were not participants in the votes last
year on this issue.
Regardless, each of these political
jurisdictions should know that we are still in gridlock throughout
metro Atlanta . Building additional roads will not solve this problem.
Metro Atlanta needs more rail
service. Metro Atlanta needs more rail service as soon as possible. The
future prospects for transportation will not improve because of these
"NO" votes. The "status quo" will eventually lead
to a reduction in the quality of service.
In essence, nothing let me
repeat, nothing will be built in the metro Atlanta area pertaining
to future rail service unless this issue is reconsidered or, in the case
of the city of Atlanta, considered and ultimately approved.
While I would agree that the
current funding formula for MARTA is inadequate for a transportation system
that has evolved into an entity with such a vital regional and statewide
impact, MARTA did not create the funding formula. Those are the rules
as they exist today regarding the funding of the system.
However, to refuse to vote
because of "disagreement" with the current funding formula is
somewhat like refusing to pay social security taxes because of one's dislike
or lack of long-term concern for the system or funding formula. Rather,
the more proactive approach would be to work diligently to change the
formula or participating political jurisdictions in the funding for the
system.
What do these "NO"
votes demonstrate? Many things, but primarily these three:
1) The lack of concern for
the future creditworthiness and favorable bond capacity of MARTA;
2) Lack of consensus on how
metro Atlanta plans to handle our future transportation needs. This particularly
hampers our congressional delegation as they attempt to convince the Bush
Administration and their own colleagues of the need for future intergovernmental
funding of this vital transit system;
And 3), the residents and travelers
driving on metro Atlanta roadways longing for the opportunity to one day
get on a train to take them where they want to be, when they want to be
there, but will not have that opportunity.
What would I suggest? Please
allow me to respectfully offer the following suggestions.
First, Fulton County and DeKalb
County commissioners should be encouraged to reconsider as soon as possible
the rapid transit contract and assistance agreement. The consequences
and benefits, along with their concerns, should be fully aired with a
"spirit of compromise" in their hearts.
Second, the current councilpersons
of the city of Atlanta should take a vote on the issue as soon as possible.
Third, the Georgia General
Assembly should adopt legislation in 2002 that requires any political
jurisdiction that has a voting member on the MARTA Board of Directors
assist in the annual funding of MARTA by the year 2006.
Lastly, the Georgia General
Assembly should adopt legislation in 2002 that calls for a constitutional
amendment, to be voted on as soon as possible, that calls for the state
of Georgia to provide a described funding assistance for MARTA, derived
from a portion of the state gasoline or cigarette tax. The amendment,
if passed, should be effective by 2006.
Leadership can help us all
out of our transportation gridlock. The counties, cities and state governments
can start today by taking the lead in this important endeavor by agreeing
to keep the transit system we have today moving in a positive direction.
[Patrick Stafford heads
the Fulton Industrial Business Association.]
Back
to Opinion Home Page | Back
to the top of the page






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…