Napster, the
popular music downloading site, has been in the news a lot lately.
Through the
use of the Napster program, users download MP3 files and then are able
to share them with all other users. There is no fee to use the site and
everybody is happy, except some musicians, like Metallica.
Since anybody
can go on to the site and download almost anything they want, by almost
any artist, people could download the entire catalog of any band and never
pay for the songs. Bands like Metallica argue that as Napster's popularity
rises, people will stop purchasing their albums and will simply download
the songs and burn their own CDs.
This really
does not happen that often, as downloading songs can be time consuming
and burning CDs can be expensive and even more time consuming.
I can see why
some starving artist bands may feel cheated. If their band is only moderately
popular and struggling, every album sale counts, but Metallica, one of
the best-selling rock 'n' roll bands of all time, is hardly struggling.
The band was paid one million dollars for a one-hour performance for the
Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame. They make millions off merchandising, concerts,
albums and videos and show no sign of slowing down.
In fact, many
people who use Napster do so to listen to new music and influence their
purchases. For instance, a person who has heard Andrea Bocelli's "Con
Te Partiro" can download more Bocelli and decide whether to purchase
an entire album.
Another thing
that many opponents of Napster should realize is that without a CD burner
or portable MP3 player, users can only listen to the songs on their computers.
I can't take my computer in the car with me and I can't lug it to the
gym when I work out.
Napster is
proposing a monthly user fee that would go into effect this summer and
users are claiming they will jump ship if this happens. They might. It
seems that there are several other programs like Napster around the world
and they work better and more efficiently at no cost. The fact that other
programs exist and that Napster-like programs will undoubtedly spring
up if and when a fee is put into effect, makes the fight against Napster
seem futile.
At any given
time 10,000 users are online and sharing files and that number is destined
to grow larger.
Napster has
been around for awhile, but I didn't download the program until December
after we got a DSL line installed. This makes download times very low
and makes Napster more worthwhile. Since the end of December I have downloaded
more than 300 songs and I have yet to come close to downloading a full
album from any artist, much less an entire catalog.
In fact, one
of the best things about Napster is the availablity of rare tracks and
cover songs that can't be purchased anywhere. It has also opened my eyes
to forms of music I would never have listened to before. I have more than
20 theme songs from some of my favorite television programs.
I urge each
and everyone of you to try out this fantastic program, before it is too
late. Log on, share your MP3 files with the world and download a Metallica
song wile you're at it.
Back
to the Top of the Page







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…