Last week was
the first public meeting of the new Fayetteville Historic Preservation
Commission.
And while some
local residents expressed concern about another government body possibly
interfering with their rights to tend to their property, city officials
said that there's no reason to worry about that.
The commission,
formed last year by the City Council, consists of five members Chairman
Addison Lester, Cochairman Sabrina Snowden, and members Tana Heaton, Lisa
Hovey-King and Tony Parrot.
Much of last
week's meeting consisted of discussions concerning proposed bylaws and
potential historic districts.
City planning
director Maurice Ungaro said that an architectural survey of the entire
county was conducted about 10 years ago by a Macon firm and the city could
get a great deal of guidance from that.
Two historic
districts in Fayetteville were recommended at that time one stretching
up Jeff Davis Drive from Ga. Highway 54 to Georgia Avenue on both sides
of the street, and another along Hwy. 54 west past Ga. Highway 85, including
the square.
Ungaro recommended
considering additional areas, such as the old school building that now
contains City Hall and some other buildings along that stretch of Hwy.
85. The Jeff Davis district could extend somewhat on the north end, he
added.
Also under
consideration is the establishment of guidelines for recognizing historic
buildings, such as the building's age (50 years or more).
A Lee Street
resident asked the commission about the effect any such rulings could
have on property values. Ungaro said that historic property almost always
increases in value as a result of that status.
He added that
an owner of historic property is not prohibited from tearing down something
on that property, selling it or even changing its use, provided other
city codes and ordinances are met.
While rezoning
property from residential to commercial or office use brings with it a
number of requirements, historic district or not, the city would have
no extraordinary control over property in a historic district if it remains
residential, Ungaro said this week.
An exception
to this would be if a structure was in a state of extreme disrepair, as
is the case from time to time with some of the city's oldest homes and
other buildings. The city has the authority to exercise a "demolition
down, in those cases.
Two items on
last week's agenda concerned requests for certificates of appropriateness.
The first, for the demolition of a structure at 355 South Glynn St., was
tabled because the applicant was not present at the meeting.
A request concerning
the enclosure of a front porch at 340 North Jeff Davis was approved.







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…