The Coweta
County Commission stepped into the fray last week over the indictments
of recently elected Clerk of Superior Court Mary Jane Thompson.
Thompson was
indicted on 18 charges last week concerning a missing $8,400 from the
clerk's office last spring when she worked as deputy clerk.
Commissioner
Lawrence Nelms responded to the recent indictments by issuing a statement
during the Dec. 14 commission meeting.
"Recent
newspaper articles have indicated that the Board of Commissioners support
the Superior Court clerk-elect and that the board has been removed from
activities surrounding the alleged problems that resulted in the recent
indictment of Clerk-elect Mary Jane Thompson by the Coweta County Grand
Jury," Nelms said.
Nelms maintained
the county was not aware of the situation until the investigation was
requested.
"In actuality,
first knowledge of any alleged problems came when Superior Court Clerk
Joan Griffies mentioned the alleged problems to County Attorney Mitch
Powell in the early months of this year. Mr. Powell suggested that if
Ms. Griffies thought there were such problems, she should ask for an investigation,"
he added.
"Ms. Griffies
then met with the Board of Commissioners concerning the alleged problems
with the board agreeing that if she thought there were such problems,
an investigation should be requested and suggested that she should go
to the district attorney or GBI to request an investigation. Ms. Griffies
then wrote a letter to District Attorney Pete Skandalakis and he requested
an investigation by the GBI," he said.
The county
was totally cooperative during the investigation, Nelms said.
"During
its investigation, the GBI asked for a forensic audit of the clerk of
Superior Court's books and asked the county to pay for that audit. The
Board of Commissioners agreed and funded the audit, which was performed
Nelms said in his formal statement.
"Any comments
made concerning the recent indictment of the Superior Court clerk-elect
were not made as a part of any meeting of the Board of Commissioners;
the comments were made as individuals talking to a reporter, not as an
official position," he added. "If the comments published are
read, the term 'support' does not appear. The comments made indicated
concern and the fact that all people are innocent until proven guilty.
Nothing else should be drawn from those comments."







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…