The Common Sense Census
Enforcement Act of 2000
I have been
contacted repeatedly by constituents who say the 2000
Census asks questions that are far too intrusive, and
unrelated to the constitutional requirement to count
Americans for the purpose of redrawing Congressional
districts.
Because of
this, I introduced "The Common Sense Census
Enforcement Act of 2000 (HR 2418) last week. The census
is constitutionally mandated for the purpose of
apportioning federal legislative districts, and the
population information gathered is also used in drawing
state legislative district lines.
The
Constitution requires the federal government to conduct
the census, and federal law (13 U.S.C. 221) also requires
that residents answer the census completely and
truthfully. Failure to answer any questions can result in
fines of up to $100. Furthermore, if one intentionally
provides inaccurate information in response to the
census, the law provides for fines up to $500.
These
penalties are understandable with regard to questions
directly related to apportionment, in light of its
central importance to our constitutional system. I do,
however, question the appropriateness of imposing such
penalties for refusal to answer questions unrelated to
apportionment.
The Common
Sense Census Enforcement Act eliminates the fine for
failure to answer Census 2000 questions unrelated to
apportionment. By taking this action, Congress can limit
the intrusive nature of the census while still providing
the government with the basic information necessary to
administer our republic.
The
intrusive questions have sparked outrage in other states.
Five Texans filed a lawsuit against most of the questions
on the Census form. In Houston, Texas, the judge hearing
their case has issued a temporary restraining order
against fining them until he has had a chance to hear the
case. Atlanta's Southeastern Legal Foundation has joined
the lawsuit.
In Georgia,
the response rate to the Census is 45 percent, and well
below the national average. Intrusive questions could
well be a factor.
Wildlife and Sport Fish
Restoration Programs Improvement Act of 2000
The misuse
of taxes paid by hunters and sports fishermen on their
equipment is one of the most blatant examples of
financial abuse I have seen in Congress. The U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service's Division of Federal Aid is,
"if not the worst, then one of the worst-managed
programs we have encountered," the non-partisan
Government Accounting Office reported after studying the
agency.
The GAO
unearthed numerous expensive trips to foreign countries,
projects and expenditures unrelated to hunting or
fishing. Hearings held by the House Resources Committee
showed that excise taxes generated $426.8 million in
revenue during 1998, of which approximately $31 million
was set aside for the Fish and Wildlife Service's
overhead.
Of this
amount, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service spent over
half - $15.8 million - on trips and projects
totally unrelated to fishing or hunting. The U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service also has misused other taxpayer
money. The director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, a Clinton-Gore political appointee, testified
before the House Resources Committee that the Fish and
Wildlife Service was attempting to buy Palmyra Atoll, an
island 1,000 miles from Hawaii, with $30 million in funds
raised through the sale of duck stamps. The tiny island
has only 10 ducks.
Although
the director conceded the acquisition of the island is
being dropped because of Congressional opposition, she
refused to rule out a future effort to buy it. They are
paying $30 million collected from hunters for only ten
ducks which are on an island that nobody can get to.
The
Clinton-Gore Administration must not be serious about
controlling fraud and abuse if it thinks $3 million per
duck is a good use of the taxpayer's money.
Congress again passes
ban on partial birth abortion
Congress
passed a bill this week to ban an abortion procedure
denounced by many experts as "infanticide." It
is the third time the House of Representatives has voted
to ban the procedure, which involves partially delivering
an infant before killing it.
The House
previously voted to ban the procedure in 1996 and 1998.
Each previous attempt at banning partial birth abortion
has been thwarted by President Clinton and pro-abortion
members of the Senate. The American Medical Association
reports that partial birth abortion is "not good
medicine" and is "not medically indicated"
in ANY situation. For this reason, the president should
sign this bill banning the procedure, but allies of the
administration predict he will veto it.
Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network Amendments of
1999
The House
of Representatives voted this week to study organ
transplant and allocation systems, and directed the
Department of Health and Human Resources to launch an
education program aimed at promoting donations. The Organ
Procurement and Transplantation Network Amendments of
1999 (HR 2418) authorizes studies of the country's organ
donation and transplant allocation system.
Allocation
will still be handled by the Organ Procurement and
Transplantation Network, which operates through regional
networks that locate donated organs and allocate them to
transplant patients.
Visitors
The
long-running members of the Georgia Building and
Construction Trades visited to discuss foreign trade
issues. Members of the Georgia Telephone Association
discussed telecommunications issues.
I also held
a meeting concerning the important land swap between
Columbus and Fort Benning. Patrick Moore from Sen.
Coverdell's office; Don Klima, director of the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation Office of Planning and
Review; Randy Rivinus, Columbus Development Authority;
Biff Hadden, Columbus Chamber of Commerce; Linda
Veenstra, staff judge advocate representative of Fort
Benning, and Scott Farley, Army Environmental Center,
visited to share information and views.
We had many
other visitors, including students from Calvary Christian
School in Cataula. The Davidson family, and Cindy and
J.D. Lester visited the office while they were touring
Washington.






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…