Location, future size of new Fayette jail remain big problems
Location,
future size of new Fayette jail remain big problems
While I can
appreciate Mr. Hamricks "opinion" regarding the
Fayetteville jail, there are a number of things he should
consider before addressing a community that he doesn't
reside in. Please note, I'll stay away from the concerns
he dismisses rather easily, such as community fears. I
would, however, like to discuss the Clayton County Jail
comparison.
Mr. Hamrick mentions that
the value of his home hasn't decreased and may have
increased in value. For him and his neighbors that is
good news. He fails to mention, however, the jail in
Clayton County is on the outskirts of town. I wonder how
the community of Clayton County would have responded if
the jail were placed in a corresponding location that the
proposed judicial center was going in Fayetteville.
The second point I want to
address is his definition of "enlarge."
According to the dictionary, "enlarge" means
"to make larger in size." If the proposed jail
had a limit for the first pod of 192 inmates, most of us
would say fine. The problem however is that the
commissioners have "planned" for four pods that
will bring the total number of beds to over 800, if you
include the 80-some inmates it now holds. To many people
expanding 1000 percent means essentially building a new
jail.
Still not a problem if the
location supports the best interest of the community.
This sounds much like the approach that Clayton County
and others take. They realized they needed it and put it
on the outskirts of town.
The argument sounds
familiar doesn't it? For those of us that used to live
near a jail, you could "wrap" this package
anyway you want, but the reality is a jail is a jail and
we should accept the things that go along with it.
Getting away from these things is why we moved to
Fayetteville in the first place.
Lastly, his comments about
"who knows when pods three and four would be
built... five, 10 or 20 years," probably has some
merit. However, if Fayetteville continues our current
growth rate and the jail is built "in
anticipation" for the number of inmates they'll
need, it should be a forgone conclusion we'll need to
build the pods. When's the last time we read about a jail
being 60 percent full?
Also, as Mr. Hamrick
pointed out, there are two to three times the inmates,
which is why we need to expand in the first place.
Unfortunately, jails are like the field of dreams... if
you build it, they will come. I would rather we
acknowledge the fact that the pods will have to be built
and address the location issue.
I could go on, but I'm
hoping the meeting Thursday evening will help us all
understand the logic behind this planned location.
Pete Benedetti






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…