Why is Smola lying about anti-SPLOST people?

Why is

Smola lying about anti-SPLOST people?

Who is Janet Smola

and why is she lying about Carl Avrit?

I attended

the hearings a few days ago at the State Capitol where a

board heard two complaints:

Case 1:

Claude Paquin had filed charges of conflict of interest

against the pro-SPLOST organization, the Fayette County

Board of Education. Mr. Paquin presented eye-opening,

Board of Education internal memoranda and letters which

showed a close and clear working relationship between our

Board of Education and the company which would get about

$3 million in underwriting fees if SPLOST won.

Eye-opening!

The board's

lead counsel strongly recommended prosecution after Mr.

Paquin's testimony. Unfortunately, this Democratic board,

which is a lap dog for the National Education

Association, unanimously dismissed Mr. Paquin's most

excellent case.

Case 2:

Janet Smola filed charges against pro-child,

anti-SPLOST activist Carl Avrit for his funding of an

anti-SPLOST telephone campaign, flyers, etc., and that

the telephone calls had lied about the SPLOST.

It quickly

became apparent that Ms. Smola had done poor due

diligence regarding her charges. Even though it was

well-known that Mr. Avrit was anti-SPLOST via his letters

to the editor which were printed in local newspapers; and

even though Mr. Avrit's phone number is in the local

phone book, Ms. Smola had never attempted to call Mr.

Avrit to see if her charges would be accurate.

Ms. Smola's

presentation was pathetic, and even though she was shown

to be a liar on most issues, she refused to apologize to

Mr. Avrit. The board's lead counsel was quiet on Ms.

Smola's complaint.

Unfortunately,

this Democratic hearing board, which is a lap dog for the

National Education Association, was shocked -

shocked! - that Mr. Avrit's truthful and accurate

telephone calls had not identified his organization's

name, rank and serial number and unanimously recommended

further prosecution on this one Mickey Mouse charge.

Jesus

Christ said that "lawyers and priests would choke on

a gnat and swallow a camel." Jesus would have said

the same of the members of that State Capitol hearing

board. What a waste of taxpayer money. What a waste of

Mr. Avrit's time and money. Must we now obtain a license

to speak?

William

J. Bryan III

Peachtree

City

�

<!-------------