A recent
article about the opening of Arbor Place Mall struck me
as ironic. It seems that the big new Douglas County mall
may be remembered as a landmark on the road to smarter
access planning.
Residents of the adjacent
subdivision can't walk to the mall that borders their
backyards because there are no connecting streets or
paths. Reasons include NIMBY - "Not in my back
yard" - opposition from those very residents,
but even despite their antagonism, developers tried to
get permits to build a golf cart path linking
neighborhoods and shopping center.
Getting necessary
permission from local governments was too complex and
they gave up. Those objecting neighbors will eventually
begin using Arbor Place, but they'll have to drive to get
there.
They might as well live 30
miles away.
Other older malls and
business centers are also looking at ways to give
pedestrians easier access to shops and offices. It's
interesting to note that when Joel Cowan - now chair
of the Georgia Regional Transportation Authority, charged
with cleaning up the air and reducing traffic congestion
- was developer of Phipps Plaza, he tried to
persuade Lenox Square to agree to a connecting tunnel
linking the two malls under Peachtree Street. Lenox
wanted none of it.
Today, both complexes are
under the same ownership. A shuttle connects them, and a
consultant has recommended exactly the type of tunnel
Joel pictured three decades ago. Imagine what it will
cost in year 2000 dollars and in traffic disruption.
Retrofits are seldom cheap.
With federal funding for
road construction frozen until metro Atlanta cleans up
its air, planners are finally beginning to look at ways
to get people out of their cars. Polls show that most
people agree that there's a problem and indicate that
they'll help to solve it, but even the best-intentioned
environmentalist finds it difficult to allow the extra
time required by public transportation - to say
nothing of her reluctance to leave the perception of
safe, free travel in the security of her automobile.
(I say
"perception" because statistically you are less
safe traveling by car than by any form of public transit,
and it is anything but free. You wouldn't be allowed a
31-cents-per-mile tax deduction on business-related
mileage if the federal government didn't consider the
cost of driving at least that or higher.)
My sense of irony,
mentioned earlier, is tweaked by the fact that GRTA-chair
Cowan had more than a little to do with the planning that
went into my favorite hometown, Peachtree City. There's
no question that his wisdom and that of many of the other
early designers produced one of the most comfortable
living environments anywhere.
The cart path system here
provides an alternative so coveted elsewhere, and so
difficult to retrofit. Case in point: paths were not in
the initial plans of Peachtree City, and putting one in
place recently alongside Hip Pocket Road, the city's
second oldest street, spurred anger and ill will between
neighbors.
Peachtree City was designed
on a 1950s drawing board, with villages clustered around
commercial centers to solve the problem of downtown
blight. (If you don't have a downtown, you won't have
blight, the reasoning ran.)
Trouble is, without a
downtown, you also don't have a focal point for major
community events. We've centered many of our municipal
celebrations on our stunning City Hall Plaza, and that's
good. Still, a lot of us cast envious eyes on towns that
have a center square, theaters, libraries, restaurants
and shops within walking distance of each other, and
public transportation to get wherever else people need to
go.
Instead, we have a growing
number of shopping centers spaced just far enough apart
that the only reasonable way to reach them is by car. Not
many people have the time or inclination to drive a golf
cart all the way from Braelinn to Westpark or Kedron and
back.
It's easy to see where
long-range planning didn't get it right. The challenge is
to take those missteps and apply the lessons learned to
today's planning. It won't be easy. For all our vaunted
path system, there are serious gaps in facilitating cart
or pedestrian traffic within shopping centers themselves.
I've long advocated requiring golf cart parking places in
the site plan of all public buildings, preferably near
main entrances to encourage people to use carts instead
of cars.
And while it's easy to run
close-to-home errands by cart without risking street
traffic, once in a large parking lot, pedestrians and
carts become mighty vulnerable competing for space with
cars. Pedestrians especially, or kids on bikes, crossing
from one side of a parking lot to another, have no option
but to thread their way through cars, either parked or on
the move. I keep wishing an entrepreneur who can absorb
the cost for a long, long time would offer some sort of
jitney service around the county - a well-advertised
loop linking Peachtree City village centers with each
other and City Hall, then out to the hospital and medical
centers springing up in mid-county.
From there it would connect
with the county offices and up to the Big Box malls on
the north side of Fayetteville. It would need at least
two, maybe three stops within the Pavilion - the
sheer distance from one end of that complex to the other
is prohibitive, and, there again, neither he safety nor
the convenience of pedestrians was part of the plan.
My dream-shuttle would hit
every stop at 15-minute intervals during the business
day. My entrepreneur will need at least five busses
- four for the road, one for a spare.
But does it really matter?
Twenty years from now, exhausted from fighting traffic or
changing busses, we may all be shopping by computer,
wondering why our county is laced with cart paths and
crisscrossed with shuttle routes.
Besides, who's going to
call a Fayette Area Regional Transit Authority by its
acronym?
<!--##############







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…