As
expected, developers of the planned apartment complex to
be located on Line Creek Parkway dove headfirst into the
city's recent traffic debate at Monday night's Peachtree
City Planning Commission meeting.
At issue
was a suggested condition to the approval of the
conceptual site plan for the 399-unit complex, requiring
Summit Properties to "demonstrate that the
development of this project will not have a negative
impact on the existing level of service within the Ga.
[Highway] 54 corridor."
Summit
representatives noted that any development of the
property, which is currently barren land, could be
construed as having some type of negative impact on
traffic, but that is not the issue, they added.
What was
also objectionable to Summit was the fact that
"negative impact" is difficult to define.
"What does `negative impact' mean?" asked
attorney Doug Dillard, representing Summit.
Dillard
repeatedly told the Planning Commission that, as a matter
of law, this project must be considered according to the
ordinances in effect when the application was made, and
any traffic ordinance or other action taken in the near
future cannot apply to the apartments.
Pointing
out that apartments were approved for the site several
years ago as a result of a court settlement concerning
the property, Dillard said that more than $5 million has
been spent to get the development process going and
Summit will help the city in any way it can as long as it
does not stop development.
Bill Brown,
a regional vice president for Summit who handled the
initial purchase of the property, reiterated Dillard's
comments about his company's commitment, saying that
Summit has already paid sewer fees in advance, among
other expenses.
"The
city committed to let us build apartments," he said.
"We've done what we are supposed to do. This is not
a new plan. This is not a surprise."
Brown said
that because of prior agreements between Summit and the
city and the settlement, the project should be exempt
from the proposed condition concerning traffic.
There were
other concerns besides traffic, however. One local
resident addressed the commission about his concerns for
the effect of water runoff onto the nearby Wynnmeade
subdivision, and the owner of a nearby piece of property
also had water concerns.
Planning
Commission members had some trouble coming up with the
exact language they wanted for approval of the project.
Jim Finney
suggested eliminating the controversial condition and
replacing it with one that was also discussed at the
meeting, addressing engineering and hydrology. Unrelated
to the traffic issue, that condition and the other seven
were fine with Summit.
Willis
Granger said the wording in the traffic condition should
be changed from "negative impact on the level of
service" to "decrease the level of
service," referring to the letter grades given in
various traffic studies. He said that the Planning
Commission should not eliminate this point completely,
but should follow the City Council's direction and
address it.
Granger
made a motion based on his suggestion, but it died for
lack of a second. Finney then made his motion, which was
seconded by Wes Saunders, but the vote was 2-2.
Granger
then suggested changing the wording in the condition to
require the applicant to comply with the city's proposed
traffic ordinance, if and when it is adopted. Dillard
emphatically stated that there was no way his client
would agree to that.
Finally,
Finney moved to approve the plan, with the condition that
information from Summit's independent traffic study be
included in the ongoing Dames and Moore study covering
the entire corridor. Saunders seconded, and it passed
3-1, with the lone dissenting vote coming from Geraldine
Holt, who was sitting in her final meeting as a member of
the Planning Commission.
Construction
on the apartments should take 18 months from start to
finish, according to a Summit representative. The company
plans to own and operate the complex on a long-term
basis, as it does with other properties in the metro
Atlanta area.







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…