Do you remember back in the
1980s, how friends would suddenly disappear for months,
even years, later to surface with the explanation:
"I got a computer"?
My friend Mike Carroll was
typical. We worked together in the fire department as
volunteer paramedics. He was a busy kind of guy, what
with running an industry, working diligently with his
college fraternity, and landscaping his lot on Lake
Peachtree, and he had trouble finding enough hours in the
day.
Then he dropped out of
sight. He was one of the first people I knew who bought a
personal computer, and he became obsessed with the thing.
This was before Windows opened and computers were a lot
more labor-intensive to learn to operate. And as quickly
as a devotee learned the newest technology or the latest
program, something newer would come out and it was back
to square one until that was mastered.
The only good thing about
it was that Patti always knew where to find Mike
- even at 3 a.m.
Dave used to sympathize
with Patti. He was himself late coming to computers and
could not for the life of him understand what Mike saw in
them.
Little did he dream he'd
become a quasi-widower himself, cleaning up after dinner,
watching Braves games by himself, running errands alone
that we used to do together.
But it's not the computer
per se (well, two computers actually) that has Dave's
aging helpmeet glued to an office chair `til all hours,
back stiff and eyes bleary from hours of names and dates
scrolling by.
It's genealogy.
As baffled as Dave was when
Mike morphed into a computer compulsive, he is even more
nonplussed over my fixation with family history. He's not
alone: a lot of people are clueless why others are
obsessed with finding out the family name of a
great-grandmother or hellbent on finding how 14th-century
Knight Balderbert links with our own ho-hum relatives.
I've been off and on with
this for a number of years, but now after a couple
"off," having more or less retired from daily
labors, I find I have the time to resume my search for my
dusty forebears.
Except that it's
disingenuous to say one has the time, especially after
what happened earlier this year. Now we must come to
terms with the fact that there will never, ever, in one
lifetime be enough time to trace every thread of the
fabric of who we are.
What happened earlier this
year is that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints, or Mormons, put their gargantuan database of
names and families on the Internet.
LDS beliefs require members
to document their genealogy, and their collection is
probably the largest single gathering of family
information - Mormon or not - in history.
And all a genealogist needs to access it is a computer, a
modem, and an Internet provider, common tools today.
Many of us have waited too
long to seek family lore from our own senior members.
Even with an oral history, trips to musty courthouses or
country churches would still be necessary to substantiate
it. That's really the only sure way to determine that
great-Aunt Phoebe's father was great-great-grandfather
Hans Georg, and that she was indeed born in 1772.
Computer genealogy is
admittedly dicey and only as accurate as the researcher
who filed it. You can bring up a name listed four times
with parents and county of birth confirming what you
already have - but with four different birth dates.
So you settle on the
likeliest and everything correlates with information you
already have - expect that great-great-Uncle
Theophilus seems to have died three years after probation
of a will you have seen with your own eyes and know to be
authentic.
And the LDS material can be
awfully sterile. At most - at MOST -
you'll get parents' names and perhaps their history
(pedigree, the Mormons call it), and the names and dates
of siblings, spouses and children.
With luck, you'll be able
to go back a few generations, or forward, and know with
certainty that you have one more piece in the puzzle that
shows you from whence you come.
But even with that kind of
luck, you won't find Uncle John's memory of an older
brother who died in the Great War, a man so big he could
hold a 50-pound bag of flour under each arm.
You won't learn that your
third great-grandmother was considered the family's
musician, with an exquisite voice and enough competence
on the violin to entertain in her father's riverside inn.
You wonder if great-Aunt
Margaretha is the one you should blame for your tendency
to get pot-bellied, or should you thank her for the
needlework skills you seem to have inherited?
Since the LDS material has
come out, I've broken through a couple of brick walls, as
genealogists like to call difficult links in a family
line. More importantly, I've revisited some Pennsylvania
Web sites and found that while I was slacking off,
someone was posting enormous loads of new information.
I've also rediscovered the
delight in e-corresponding with people working on related
lines. They are so sympathetic in supplying what they
can, or suggesting other directions in which to search.
Yes, I'm obsessive, yes,
I'm keeping ridiculous hours, yes, I'm neglecting friends
and spouse. But oh! that surge of adrenalin when a name
or date suddenly clicks in place.
"So what?" shrugs
Dave. He hasn't a clue. Never will.
<!--##############







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…