STORIES GO HERE---------------------->
In an
article The Citizen dated May 21, [Peachtree City's
director of planning and development] Jim Williams is
reported to have said that city got involved in tenant
matters because we lacked tenant interest for The Mews
project at the intersection of Walt Banks Road and Ga.
Highway 54.
Anyone who
has been involved with this process since last fall knows
how ridiculous that allegation is. We had a great
outpouring of tenant interest in The Mews project. The
fact of the matter is that the Planning Department of
Peachtree City made a marketing decision last fall to
push this project to the intersection of hwys 54/74, and
as a part of that decision started a lobbying campaign
against our zoning at Walt Banks and Hwy. 54.
After our
zoning was denied, which was due largely to Jim Williams'
public opposition - all of which is in the public
record - tenants have had no choice but to choose an
inferior, secondary site in Peachtree City or to make the
decision to skip the Peachtree City market altogether, as
some have done.
The irony
of all this is that prior to ever pursuing the Walt
Banks/Hwy. 54 site, we ourselves had considered the hwys.
54/74 intersection for our project.
However, we
were in possession of an official letter Jim Williams
personally had sent as far back as 1996 to the Coweta
County government describing the stretch of Hwy. 54
between Hwy. 74 and Coweta County as "dangerous and
congested," and strongly advising Coweta County
against considering any development in this area.
We never
would have believed subsequent to writing such a letter
to a neighboring government body, the Peachtree City
Planning and Development Department would do an abrupt
about-face and would endorse the development of some
300,000 square feet of retail development at the
"dangerous" intersection of hwys. 54/74.
What is
even more remarkable is that while a traffic impact study
is required as a part of the site plan approval process
on the development at that intersection, Williams
admitted in the May 26 meeting that no such study had
been conducted.
If the
Peachtree City Planning and Development Department
regarded the roads in that area as far back as 1996 as
dangerous, how in the interest of public safety can they
support the development of a large project in this area
without so much as the benefit of a traffic impact study?
John W.
Callaway, Ph.D.
Atlanta
[Editor's
note: Callaway is the developer who proposed The Mews.
<!-------------






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…