Comtibuting
Writer
The past year of
schoolhouse bloodshed has loosed a torrent of ink in the
debate about what has gone wrong with America.
Theories abound. We pick
and choose among them: The Internet. God having been
"thrown out of the schools." The entertainment
industry. The media.
Failure of educators.
Failure of parents. Failure of society.
Here's my take, and a word
of hope.
I believe that what we are
seeing in these once-unthinkable events is the result of
a desensitization process driven by so-called free speech
advocates and carried out by the entertainment industry
and the media.
Both have pushed their
share of envelopes in the name of free speech and
expression, so that what we watch from our dinner tables
rivals X-rated films. Words and pictures deliver the
evening news in the most graphic detail possible, from a
cigar in the Oval Office to the rent bodies of children
in Kosovo. No effort to shock is spared, no obscenity
deemed too offensive, until finally we are beyond being
disturbed by what we read or see.
There's a reason human
psyches flinch at depravity. The sight or sound of other
human beings being hurt, especially the young and the
helpless, evokes in normal people the primitive
fight/flight response. The intent is protection of self
or of the helpless among us.
For some, however, that
jolt of adrenalin brings pleasure, and to achieve another
"hit," they seek more and more stimulation.
Some may find it in bungee jumping, others in porn
flicks. And for still others, in video games that make
the destruction of human life a victory.
And when these no longer
thrill, we ratchet up to whatever does, whether sexual
abuse, blowing up buildings, murder, or the ultimate
thrill, self-destruction.
I don't intend to rant and
rave about how different things were In My Day. Like the
car ad used to say, "This is not your father's
Oldsmobile."
Things are different and
will never go back to the way they were In My Day. Advice
to myself: Deal with it.
But there is hope. There
are solutions.
One is to make it a given
that parents or legal guardians are responsible for
whatever mischief their children commit. I can't believe
this is not already the case.
How can it be that I am
legally responsible if my dog bites your child,
especially in your yard, but not if my son demolishes
your mailbox? Why on earth would a parent NOT be held
criminally liable if his child aims a gun at another
child and pulls the trigger?
When a housing authority
- was it Chicago's? - adopted a zero-tolerance
policy concerning drugs found on the premises, whole
families were evicted because one member had a roach in
his pocket. Incidents of drug offenses plummeted once it
dawned on parents that they were going to take the heat
for their kids' misbehavior.
As for gun control, I agree
with those who suggest that "responsible gun
ownership" would be a more palatable term. If that's
what it takes to get the NRA's cooperation on common
sense legislation, fine, coat it with sugar candy, but do
whatever it takes before more innocents die.
People who like to label
people call me a liberal, and in many ways I am. I cannot
conceive, for example, of why anyone would object to the
registration of a deadly weapon, yet think nothing of the
fact that our cars have to be registered.
Or why anyone believes his
freedom of expression would be jeopardized by
restrictions on what can be shown on movie, TV, and home
computer screens, yet accept as fair restrictions on the
speed he can drive or laws requiring that one lane of
traffic yield to another.
To be free, we sometimes
have to give up freedom. When the well-being of society
is at risk because of the actions of any member of it,
government, acting on behalf of the people, must restrict
those actions, whether the publication of recipes for
bombs or the imposition of speed limits in a school zone.
Why do I think there's
hope? Last month, 20/20 had a stunning piece about how
Fiji changed from a society in which, a century ago,
murder was the leading cause of death among all ages to a
society with one of the lowest murder rates in the world.
There are a lot of factors
involved, human nature being so complex. Among them: a
commitment to make childhood such a happy, protected time
that kids are not in a hurry to grow up; absence of the
stimuli of television and movies (like those in which
American children see thousands of violent deaths before
they get out of grade school); and the possession of
firearms is absolutely prohibited.
The hopeful element is how
all this came about. The researcher featured in the 20/20
story believes that the Fijians simply became fed up with
the violence among them and willed it to end. There is a
saturation point a society can reach, he says, and
decides that enough is enough. He says it has happened in
other cultures as well as in Fiji, and it can happen in
America.
It seems a long shot, but I
am hopeful for this reason: I have lived through times
when we thought it was perfectly all right for public
places to be divided between "white" and
"colored," when people accepted limitations
simply because of race.
But no longer.
I remember well when people
smoked everywhere and without apology, when city council
meetings, church board meetings, airplanes, buses, even
hospital rooms were gray with stinging smoke, and it
never occurred to anyone that that would ever change.
But no longer.
Sometimes our elected
officials are slow to get our drift, but I do believe
that when we as a people finally decide enough is enough,
and are determined that the desensitization of children
will stop, that easy access to weapons will end, that the
community will hold parents responsible for their
children's actions, we will secure the most precious
freedom of all: freedom from fear.
<!--##############







Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…