It's nearly
impossible not to grasp at all the easy
"if-onlies" when a tragedy happens like the
shootings in Littleton, Colo. last week.
If only we
could keep guns out of the hands of children...
If only
teachers and school administrators had noticed the
"warning signs" that these kids were
homicidal...
If only
parents would teach their children respect for life...
If only
movies weren't so violent...
If only...
You would
have to be almost as callous as those two killers not to
look for answers, not to search for a combination of
solutions that would make our schools safe.
There's
nothing wrong with that. If there is something we can do
that would at least make such an awful event less likely,
then we shouldn't rest until we find it.
Painful as
it is to realize it, though, there's probably not a
complete solution. Human beings are what we are, and some
of us are garbage.
Some people
have no respect for others' property. Some respect
property but not truth and justice. Some are so depraved
that they have no respect for love or honor.
When you
get to the deepest part of the human gene pool among the
muck and mire, the stench and filth of the worst kinds of
people, you find that there is no respect even for life
itself, and you know you've reached the bottom.
Maybe
someday they'll find the right button, some genetic
defect that can be fixed using lasers or chemicals, to
make all of us good. Is that what we want?
Or would
that remove freedom of choice - the very essence of
what makes us human? We choose to do right or do wrong.
You can't flip someone else's switch.
At least
perhaps science will find a way to identify violent
tendencies early on so we can take the proper
precautions, maybe control the urge to violence with
drugs. Maybe... but I think some people still simply
choose to be scum and killers, with no help from genetics
or improper chemical balance, and no tip-off that we
could identify.
The best we
can hope for is to use whatever science we can muster
- psychiatry, drugs, social engineering, even shock
therapy if it'll work - and reduce the threat as
much as we can.
It's also
easy to believe that someone did something wrong that
caused these two boys to kill. They were outcasts, the
talking heads keep reminding us. Kids in school treated
them cruelly. Maybe their parents were violent, giving
them a bad example to follow, or were cruel to them,
ruining their self esteem.
Millions of
people are treated cruelly, with deep physical and
emotional abuse far worse than being taunted or
disrespected by one's peers in high school. Most don't
respond by killing a dozen innocent people.
Blaming the
guns, the music or the movie industry is so easy. But
tighter gun control laws will never prevent the lawless
from getting their hands on guns. And as much as we would
love to squelch the many movies and songs that glorify
hatred and violence, you can't blame pop culture for
something like this.
If you
examine all the solutions that are being suggested, most
of them involve taking freedom away from the law-abiding
in order to make us all more safe.
There are a
few things we can do to make schools a bit more safe.
Cameras and alarms might help, and we could arm and train
some administrators and resource officers so that at
least the kids would have a fighting chance if violence
breaks out.
Tighter
security in schools? How does a metal detector stop
someone who simply walks into a school building and
starts shooting?
But for the
most part, as I said in this space a few weeks ago, we
have to decide in this nation whether we want freedom or
security.
Nobody said
it was an easy or painless choice.
<!-------------






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…