Annexation vexation

News
Share this Post

Annexation vexation

News
Share this Post

After a discussion meeting last week about a proposed fifth village for

Peachtree City, Mayor Bob Lenox says his primary concern is that the potential

annexation area become a model for "managed growth."

He and several council members stressed that no annexation would

take place without a really detailed and comprehensive plan, including zoning, in

the area generally bounded by the city limits on the south and east, Tyrone on the

north and Line Creek on the west.

Their remarks reflected the insistence of about 20 residents who spoke at

the meeting, almost all of whom called for any new development or annexation

to reflect Peachtree City's original efforts at planning growth so it happens a little at

a time, and managing it to see that appropriate land uses come into

newly-developed areas.

Citizens who spoke were concerned about trees, housing density,

industrial and commercial uses, traffic

congestion, railroad crossings, emergency

services, protection of Line Creek, and other issues. Those who spoke their concerns

did so without regard to whether those concerns fall within the purview of the

city council. Another recurring concern was whether the new property would

be "Peachtree City as it is, or Peachtree

City as it was," as expressed by Walt Mashburn.

Mayor Bob Lenox said the city has "no interest in annexing this or any other

area unless it is pre-planned and zoned down to the last piece of grass."

Total acreage of the proposed "McIntosh Village" is about 1166, with

246 acres of that already in the city, including Planterra Ridge subdivision and the

proposed Cedarcroft cluster homes and apartment complex developments.

Jim Williams, director of developmental services for the city, said that

discussions have been going on with property owners for several years, Williams

said, "and some are prepared to make decisions" about how to develop their

tracts. He said the dialogue with the owners and developers has been an effort to try to assure that there is a workable, compatible plan for fitting into Peachtree City in the event annexation takes place. There are certain basics that

the city would like to see on the properties, he said.

One basic is that "we feel we should not allow or encourage any development on septic tanks, but look to a sewerage solution for new developments.

Another basic thought from city planners is the process of "step-down zoning," which would see the southern end of the now-undeveloped property be used for higher-density development, and commercial and industrial

uses be located near present similar uses or along the railway on the east side of the area. Williams said there is an absolute necessity to protect the wetlands areas along Line Creek, with the creek buffered by at least 100 feet and

sometimes by as much as 900 feet, depending on the size of the marshy areas.

The city will continue to work for the four-laning of Ga. Highway 54 also, both Williams and Lenox said. A "Line Creek Parkway" connector road has already been approved for construction between the Wynnmeade

subdivision and the new cluster/apartment development, to relieve some of the east-west traffic now using Hwy. 54 to reach Ga. Highway 74, he added.

Williams said that Wynnmeade has been an "orphan" to Peachtree City for a long time, and the present plans for the Cedarcroft development "don't provide a good link" between the city and Wynnmeade. After his

remarks, Williams said "we can always elect not to annex, and take our chances."

Lenox said the property cannot remain as it is forever. Some kind of development will come, he said, and "some government entity will control it Peachtree City, or Fayette County, or the city of Tyrone."

Some residents questioned whether any development should be done at all until traffic conditions in the area are improved by four-laning Hwy. 54 and locating at least one grade-separation crossing over the railroad. The

city's plan calls for a bridge over the tracks at Kedron Drive, but there is no definite plan that includes where funds would come from for the bridge.

Lenox said the effort of Fayette governments toward a "Managed Growth Manifesto" is not aimed at "no growth," but making sure there whatever new developments occur can be serviced and fit into present communities.

<!--##############

Stay Up-to-Date on What’s Fun and Important in Fayette

Newsletter

Latest Comments

VIEW ALL
Newsletter
Scroll to Top