4660
0
Who should you vote for in Peachtree Cityās next election? In this feature, youāll find the differences between our candidates in their own words as they answer questions from The Citizen. Candidates were given exactly one week to reply to our questions.
Both candidates for City Council Post 3, incumbent Councilman Clint Holland and challenger Joe Campbell, were invited to respond to an identical set of 13 questions about governance, development, traffic, finance, and community priorities.
Each answer appears exactly as submitted, up to a 250-word limit, and has been lightly formatted for readability.
Personal contact details and website links have been removed from both candidatesā submissions. Answers were truncated to ensure the 250-word limit. In an effort of fairness, we switched the order of response for each question.
To view the full Mayoral Race comparison featuring the responses from Mayor Kim Learnard and former Mayor Steve Brown, click here to read the Mayoral Candidate Comparison article. Stay tuned for the Candidate Comparison on the other contested race in Peachtree City over the next few days. Early voting in Peachtree City starts next Tuesday, October 14 at the Library/City Hall complex.
Governance & Transparency
Q1. What sets you apart from your opponent? How would you be a better choice?
Clint Holland
Experience is the skill that matters: I have many decades managing business at an executive level and now 3 years in local government as a councilman and Mayor Pro Tem for Peachtree City. I have debated the issues and topics brought before the council. I always have my conservative principles guiding me through the discussions and debates.
I am a far more qualified council member than my opponent as I bring years of successful business experience to the council. I also bring a solid engineering background, an emphasis in economics from my Masterās Degree, and skilled leadership qualities that are highly valued by city staff and council when technical and fiscal issues are brought up. Additionally, I listen to Peachtree City people. Sometimes the listening will change my mind about the issue, or alternately, further enhance the key issues that are contained in any specific topic. Remember: Listening is far better than talking, as you learn more by listening.
As far as differentiation between me and my opponent, I have far more extensive municipal experience with my taking every possible training course on municipal government management from the Georgia Municipal Association (GMA) over my 3 years on city council. I have joined multiple committees at GMA learning how I can be a better council member to help our city use the GMA resources and people contacts. My opponent only has his Disney experience with Orlando hotels, which does not translate very well to being a leader on a municipal city [response truncated to 250 words]
Joe Campbell
My opponent thrives on political theater ā big words, little action. Weāve seen this at City Council Meetings and Work Sessions. I donāt do drama. For almost 30 years at Disney, I was in the business of solving tough problems ā the kind that involve safety, logistics, and thousands of moving parts all at once. That career taught me how to lead teams, to listen first, and to cut through noise to find real solutions. That means making decisions based on evidence, not ego. Peachtree City doesnāt need another politician performing for applause. It needs a leader who listens, analyzes, and acts in the best interest of our citizens.
My opponent has also made many mistakes and hasnāt yielded the results he promised in his first campaign. Googling him turns up words like āhit and runā, āporn siteā and āgridlockā. He has earned a reputation for saying one thing and doing another. I am known as a role model who can just get the job done.
Finally, he is running primarily focused on party affiliation ā assuming his party affiliation masks his behavior. He has lied, stating Iām a Democrat. I am registered NPA (No Party Affiliate). This is a non-partisan election, and issues like traffic, safety, and budgeting are not party issues. Capitalizing on national party divisiveness instead of focusing on the core issues is concerning.
I bring results and very tight fiscal responsibility, but in a manner that more deeply aligns with our Cityās culture and values.
Q2. Outside of public comments, how will you ensure residents have a stronger voice in city government?
Joe Campbell
Public comments shouldnāt be the only time citizens feel heard. Iāll implement online listening and feedback-gathering forums, regular town halls, and publish easy-to-read budget summaries. Iāll also expand small group listening sessions ā where groups such as moms, small business owners, veterans, seniors, and more can sit down and share concerns directly.
Iām also used to the practice of āpeer reviewsā, and for large, complex decisions, I believe we need to engage citizens to review the developing ideas and proposals at key milestones, long before we bring them forward for a vote.
Iāll also challenge the City Council to adopt more transparent metrics, such as a published āDays Cash on Handā metric for Reserves rather than talking about it in percentages. Percentages are misleading ā our citizens deserve tight fiscal responsibility down to the last dollar, and transparency on exactly where we stand. I am committed to ensuring government is a two-way conversation, not a closed-door performance.
Clint Holland
Public comment needs to be much longer than the current 3 minutes. I worked to convince the council 2 years ago to raise the time limit from 2 minutes to 5 minutes, but had to compromise at 3 minutes. If re-elected I will increase the time to speak to 5 minutes, or even unlimited, as long that the speaker stays on topic, doesnāt repeat, and doesnāt use profane language.
The quarterly town halls that we currently have in each of the cityās villages appears to work quite well as the attendance is great by the local residents in that specific village. I certainly will encourage the council and staff to maintain these quarterly town hall meetings and maybe enhance them by not only listening to the residents, buy lay out specific plans for that particular village on what is coming to their area in the near future.
Growth, Development & Annexation
Q3. How would you protect Peachtree Cityās village concept while also planning for future growth?
Clint Holland
The land plan that the city currently uses is a great working document that protects the suburban nature of our city but still allows for expansion.
Growth and expansion are inevitable as our superior quality of life, family safety through our 1st responders, great schools, jobs, single family housing, greenspace, great amenities and events, and ample recreation is what others on the outside of Peachtree City want for themselves and their families.
The current 2022 Comprehensive Plan is woefully inadequate in protecting the village concept, I know this because I was on the 2022 Comprehensive Plan committee. I was out voted when it came to restricting multifamily house.
The upcoming 2026 Comprehensive Plan will certainly protect the village concept as it will contain zoning changes to multi-family housing in Peachtree City.
Protection of the village concept is key to the overall quality of life for all residents. In order to do that, there is no need for expansion of multi-family housing, no urban sprawl, and no selling any greenspace properties to developers. Enhancing the village concept may also include annexing appropriate Fayette County land, along the outer boundaries of our city, for light industrial development. This type of industrial development allows the tax base to increase and keeps our property taxes from continuing to rise, even allows a reduction in property taxes, as the light industry continues to grow.
Joe Campbell
We need to be extremely careful here, as our biggest challenges today are the result of uncoordinated and poorly planned growth strategies. Targeted growth is my focus. I will oppose annexation that erodes our village design and density limits. Instead, we must enable investment in aging commercial spaces, improve existing neighborhoods, and align development with infrastructure capacity. The village model works because it balances green space, cart paths, and small business vitality. Protecting it means saying ānoā to projects that overcrowd and āyesā to smart, community-centered redevelopment.
My opponent wants to build an overpass at the Hwy 54/ 74 intersection. In addition to the destruction of the village feel, his idea is impractical for many reasons. One, access to many businesses at that intersection would be truncated, impacting them negatively. Two, the DOT is already spending $22M on this intersection, and to think theyāll quickly turn and spend the ~$70M required for an overpass in the near future demonstrates a lack of practicality. This proposal lacks common sense and doesnāt fit the environment of Peachtree City.
My career was spent solving complex flow and capacity issues, all while protecting the ambiance of large spaces. I created stellar experiences, regardless of the engineering we had to do behind the scenes. This requires expansive planning and industrial engineering, adhering to high standards and continually evaluating the entirety of the ecosystem. Iām strong and well-practiced at evaluating those interrelated impacts and identifying solutions that protect āthe magicā of a space but work operationally.
Traffic & Infrastructure
Q4. What additional solutions would you propose for Highway 54/74, and how should Peachtree City work with Fayette County and GDOT to implement them?
Joe Campbell
54/74 is a state and regional problem, not just ours, but we need to own the leadership position to resolve it. We must work with the GDOT, Fayette County, and our neighboring counties and municipalities. We need to collectively prioritize bypasses, development decisions, and access management. That means fewer curb cuts, dedicated turn lanes, and better traffic engineering.
You need someone who is known for partnerships and bringing diverse opinions together, and this is where I am strongest. I navigated disputes between Unions and large companies. I resolved differences of opinion between Chinese government representatives and the Disney organization as we worked on solutions for Shanghai Disneyland – I know how to bring people together with different agendas, and while it takes a ton of hard work, results are possible that bring shared success. This is the type of approach we need with our surrounding municipalities and the GDOT.
Clint Holland
Traffic issues are still a nightmare in Peachtree City, especially at SR54/SR74. This is a critical issue that must be addressed in the next 4 years.
In 2022 I wrote and published my proposed plans for the 54/74 intersection that included an SR54 overpass over SR74. At that time, it was dismissed as not a good fix because Peachtree City didnāt need a cloverleaf intersection. Well, 3 years passed and now my 2022 plan is being looked at more seriously by city residents, Fayette County transportation committee, and GDOT.
I spoke with surrounding municipalities and counties in 2023, encouraging them to join a consortium to help fund an engineering study of SR54 that would encompass the entire Fayette County SR54 all the way into Coweta County. The consortium is a mix of cities, counties, and GDOT who would then approach state and federal agencies for financial assistance to undertake this project. We are making progress on this endeavor with some cities and counties agreeing to join in this effort. Itās going to be an uphill fight with this project, but I certainly will be in the middle to help permanently fix the intersection with an overpass. Remember, projects of this magnitude take a decade to compete as it requires the help of federal, state, counties, and citiesā cooperation. But as said by the ancients: āa long journey requires the 1st stepā and that is what I plan on doing this coming council term.
Q5. Which city roads beyond 54/74 do you see as priorities for improvement, and how would you address them?
Clint Holland
Paving will be the linchpin of success for all the city streets and roads. Improvement with intersection traffic lights and golf cart crossings will always be an issue for the city as resident safety is a paramount concern.
Robinson Road may need to be reviewed to add a center turn lane to help expedite the traffic turns on that road. The road should be wide enough to accommodate a center turn lane.
Bike lanes may need to be looked at throughout the entire city so that we can keep the bike lane user safe while traveling our city street.
SR54 and SR74 are state owned roads but our citizens and those around us use those state roads every day, so continued cooperation with GDOT will be critical for keeping those 2 roads in top condition.
SR54 west of SR74 needs improvement. Hopefully improvement will be included in the intersection fix we are working on, but should it become a separate project then we need to look at widening the 54 road west of 74 by having a flowthrough lane in both directions to keep the traffic moving. At the same time, we need to include turn lanes off 54 to feed all the west side businesses onto potential frontage road and business rear roads to adequately take traffic off 54. This may then allow the removal of a traffic light or 2 from the main road. Lastly, a full synchronization of the traffic lights on 54 westside to also keep [answer truncated to 250 words].
Joe Campbell
A city-wide traffic study is essential – otherwise, the problem just moves elsewhere, and weāre in a never-ending cycle of problems. Planterra is an excellent example of this. This study will take time, and a series of āno regretsā moves can be activated immediately while that plan is developed. Targeted examples include addressing the congestion and safety issues at Robinson Road, Crosstown Drive, and Peachtree Parkway ā all are high-stress areas for families and commuters alike. Shorter term solutions are obvious, such as signal synchronization, traffic circles, and cart bridges. Some are in the works, others need to be implemented. These can be done locally, increasing our speed to results. We need resurfacing schedules that stay ahead of decay, plus traffic-calming where neighborhoods connect. Iāll push for phased funding that keeps roads safe and cart-path crossings clearly prioritized. Infrastructure isnāt flashy, but itās the backbone behind our high quality of life in PTC.
I have extensive experience in this space, having to study and plan for growth at both Walt Disney World and at Shanghai Disneyland. I learned how to understand capacity drivers and address congestion āupstreamā in the path of travel. I also learned that relationships are the key to resolving traffic issues such as ours ā I have a reputation for building strong, productive relationships that drive joint accountability. I believe Peachtree City has a charm we need to protect, and am eager to apply my experience to address the traffic challenges.
Parks & Recreation
Q6. Do you support the recently adopted Parks & Recreation Master Plan? Why or why not?
Joe Campbell
Yes ā but with accountability and a few needed additions. The plan provides a strong vision, but it canāt just be a binder on a shelf. I support its priorities ā maintaining fields, modernizing facilities, expanding trails ā but every dollar must be tied to measurable results. Families should see progress year over year, not just promises. It is evident we have a need for multi-generational opportunities like teen centers with modern day amenities, senior activities that promote a dynamic, active life, and a more robust use plan for Drake field, an underutilized asset. I was happy to see some of those included in the plan. Iām not a fan of removing landscape maintenance around playgrounds and tot lots, which is part of the current master plan in order to drive operational expense reduction. They will become unsightly and less safe weed fields if this happens. Iām also not a fan of removing playgrounds and tot lots in general because they are āunable to updateā them. We can do better, and we will.
Clint Holland
I voted to āadoptā the Parks & Recreation Master Plan when it came before council recently.
I believe that this 5-20 year plan is a road map to successful recreation in the coming years.
While I accepted the plan and agree with much of the work done by the outside consultant in this voluminous document, I believe that some parts of the recreation master plan are currently outside the scope and fiscal wherewithal of Peachtree City.
Maybe in 15-20 years we can implement a few of the expensive recreational activities, but for the near future the recreational amenities offered by the city can be expanded and new ones added per the Master Plan, like Pickleball was done recently, as long as there is adequate money put in the annual budget to keep the repairs and maintenance up to date.
Finances & Budget
Q7. What is your opinion of the current city budget? Would you have voted to pass it, and why or why not?
Clint Holland
I voted recently to pass the budget after a few weeks of council discussions and debate so we can keep all the great services we provide to the citizens while at the same time give a tax break to the property owners of our city.
I spearheaded the effort to get the tax break for the citizen on their property as others on the council fought me to keep the taxes where they were. I truly believed that we all pay too much in property taxes as we have been continually adding the excess taxes collected to the reserve fund each year. This excess tax money collected belongs to the citizens not to the city.
In my opinion, over-taxing the citizens is not a sound financial or fiscal economic policy.
I was able to accomplish the property tax reduction and still pass a balanced budget as I found many parts of the new 2026 budget that we did not need.
I worked so hard on for all the citizens on getting tax relief, so after removing $550,000 from the 2026 budget, along with much debate and compromise, we all voted to pass the 2026 budget which will result in a full millage tax rate rollback.
Joe Campbell
I would have voted for it. I would have pressed harder on more transparency ā so residents know not just what we spend, but why, and would have done three things very differently:
- I believe in āconstructive discomfortā and healthy debate, and would have ensured we worked through that early in the process. My opponent flipped his perspective, stating what a great job the team had done on the budget, and then putting it in gridlock at the end. I believe this was primarily political theater. We need to stanchly debate and own the decisions collectively on every single dollar in that budget.
- I would have more robustly scrutinized the spend and asked for a citizenās review mid-way through the process. Letās have our citizens review an early draft and critique it for us, challenging our thinking and ensuring we get the best possible output.
- I was embarrassed for our City Council on the day it passed, on one particular issue: our people. Our City Workers are extraordinary, and my opponent pressed and gained approval to remove their merit pay from the budget. His exact words were ābut they got their COLA (cost of living) increases.ā This is unjust ā in a year with inflation such as ours, a cost-of-living increase is NOT a bonus. We have extraordinary talent working for our City, and removing our ability to recognize and reward great talent puts us at risk and is simply poor leadership character.
Q8. Do you believe Peachtree Cityās reserves are appropriate? If so, why? If not, why?
Joe Campbell
No, and Iām eager to dig in on this one. My calculations, from what I can get visibility to, indicate we are over in our reserves. That said, I need to do a detailed review after being elected to more deeply understand what it takes to run this city for one day.
From there, I believe we need to shift to a Days Cash on Hand approach to reserves, and stop talking about it as a percentage. While our percentage may have decreased, we havenāt materially reduced the total dollars allocated for reserves since it was increased in 2020. Iād propose we use the guidelines from Moodyās and other bond investors which suggest 150 Days Cash on Hand is a ābest in classā benchmark for small governments, which can maintain our strong bond rating but not over-inflate the reserves pool.
I would then publicly report on our Days Cash on Hand each month, down to the last penny, against the 150-day mark. Anything above that threshold should be re-invested back into the city. While there are some limits to how reserves can be reinvested, it can help by funding capital projects, thereby giving some relief to the budget, and accelerating projects meant for the future. It can also be used to address aging utility needs.
Clint Holland
I have been insisting for over 2 years that we have far too much in the bloated reserve funds. I brought this up at all city council retreats and at city council meetings.
The current reserve fund is around $34.5 million or approx. 59% of the 2026 budget.
This large amount is not necessary to keep us fiscally sound and allow us to keep the Investment Grade AAA bond rating (weāve had the AAA bond rating for many, many years), as many on council have said. Instead the AAA bond rating is due to the correct accounting practices, stable revenue sources, excellent evaluations by the auditors, adequate reserve funds, minimum debt levels, minimum risk of default, and overall solid financial management. These are the fundamental financial factors that determine the bond rating, not the excess size of the reserve fund.
According to the State of Georgiaās recommendation for municipalities, a city should have approx. 31-35% of their annual budget in reserve funds. The 59% we have currently is almost double what is required by the State of Georgia.
I believe that we should continue following good fiscal management and keep lowering taxes so that we are not adding the excess taxes collected each year to the reserve fund.
Q9. Increases in pay rates for Peachtree City Staff including first responders and police have not kept up with inflation in the last several yearsā budgets. What would you do about this? Why do you think it matters . . . or doesnāt?
Clint Holland
Letās be clear, the city council already voted to significantly increase the pay rates for all 1st responders in the 2024 budget. Although the adjustment in 2024 budget was to be only for 1st responders, it was decided to do a pay adjustment/correction for all city employees at that time. This large adjustment was carried forward into the 2026 budget with a cost of living adjustment (COLA) to keep the employeeās current with inflation, so they donāt fall behind other well paid 1st responders statewide.
In speaking with many of our 1st responders personally, I can tell you that far and away they are very satisfied with the adjustment we did in 2024 to allow them to be one of the highest paid 1st responder organizations in the metro Atlanta area.
I can also assure the citizen that we are currently properly compensating our 1st responders as the retention of the 1st responders is at a very high level. Additionally, all the 1st responders are getting the most up to date technology and equipment so that they can do their jobs as safely and effectively for the protection of all our citizens.
Joe Campbell
It matters deeply and this is a topic where I get pretty fired up. People matter. OUR people matter ā we have extraordinary employees who work for Peachtree City and are the backbone of what makes our City great. When pay for our first responders and city employees falls behind inflation, we risk losing them to neighboring cities.
I will prioritize competitive pay ā because safety and service quality depend on retaining skilled professionals. Families expect quick 911 response and safe streets. That starts with valuing the people who deliver this for us.
In 2023 a compensation plan established a system where merit increases could be considered for employees. This is where my opponent and I differ deeply. As part of his late-game recommendations to the new budget, he actively advocated removing those merit pay incentives, citing that ātheyāre getting their COLA (cost of living) increasesā. This cost of living increase has not matched inflation rates in 2023 or 2024, and will not for 2025.
Keeping up with inflation and recognizing them for their stellar performance is a must. I remember vividly being an hourly worker, living paycheck to paycheck. This is a stress I would wish on no one ā particularly our City workers who have clearly proven they are the best in the business. I will not support forgoing merit pay in future budgets, and will advocate for a corrective adjustment to ensure alignment with inflation. We should be known as a city that cares for our people.
Environment & Greenspaces
Q10. What specific improvements or protections would you prioritize for our greenspaces during your term?
Joe Campbell
Greenspaces are the heart of Peachtree Cityās identity, and a large part of what makes our City one of the best places to live in the United States. I always tell others – you know the moment you cross into Peachtree Cityā¦ the billboards disappear, the trees and winding paths take over. It is a very special community.
I have strong views on protecting our greenspaces and the overall aesthetic of our City. First, Iāll protect cart paths, preserve green buffers, and maintain our lakes as a non-negotiable. This will include a push to expand tree canopy protections ā because once green space is lost, itās gone forever. Second, Iāll push for expanded new build criteria that requires honoring the existing greenspaces even when developing on existing parcels. This includes opposing any zone changes to existing OS-C (Open Space and Conservation) areas. I will push for more stringent development and building codes that require, not just suggest, inclusion of green space in future development, residential and commercial. Finally, Iāll prioritize partnerships with schools and local organizations to expand environmental education and community-driven protection efforts, so the next generation understands why stewardship matters. I have done some of the lake clean-up experiences with my son, and it is rewarding on many levels. Protecting greenspaces isnāt just about beauty ā itās about preserving health, safety, and the small-town feel that sets us apart.
Clint Holland
Simple answer: never sell any greenspace property to developers or to anyone, ever!
Our greenspace is sacrosanct to the ideals contained within the village concept. We all want to live a rural/suburban lifestyle with our families, not an urbanize lifestyle surrounded by concrete and asphalt.
The city greenspace is protected and maintained by the Peachtree City Public Works who care for the greenspace. We maintain and rebuild the multi-use paths throughout the cityās greenspace annually. Additionally, the city does a host of other greenspace management projects: removal of Pine Beetle infected trees, local wildlife management, removal of invasive species of animals and plants, and clearing undergrowth necessary for police/fire access. Deer population is a current topic. The Georgia Department of Natural Resources determined Peachtree City has an overabundance of deer in our city. Our city management worked on a deer management program to control the explosive deer population growth in our city by beginning to selectively cull the deer herd to manageable levels.
The beavers in Camp Creek area are a nuisance animal. The city management has worked on removing/eradicating the beaver for 2 years. Success is being seen but the beaver is difficult to eradicate completely.
I have a particular interest in invasive species of plants in our city as bamboo has grown extensively throughout of city and pushed the native plant species out, and the Bradford Pear tree which was used extensively in past years is not native to Georgia. Our city needs to use native Georgia trees [answer truncated to 250 words].
Public Safety
Q11. How should Peachtree City address recruitment and retention challenges in police and fire?
Clint Holland
Simplest answer of all the questions asked: As I answered previous, keeping the 1st responders adequately compensated for their service to our residentās safety and protection is key to retention and job satisfaction by the 1st responders. These 1st responders risk their lives for our protection and should be honored for their service to our community with good compensation and state of the art equipment to do their job safely and efficiently.
Joe Campbell
Public safety is non-negotiable. Recruitment must start with competitive pay and benefits, but retention goes deeper. Our officers and firefighters need modern equipment, realistic staffing levels, and leadership that supports them. If our people feel undervalued or overworked, theyāll leave for neighboring communities. Recruitment is about reputation ā if we value our officers and firefighters, word spreads. Retention is about leadership and pay fairness. Both must be carefully maintained to remain competitive.
I firmly believe our Police and First Responders should be well funded, fully equipped, and the best trained professionals in the field. My opponent actively defunded a proposed training tower for our Fire Department, under a political guise of saving taxpayerās money. A savings that equates to pennies a day.
I will also support investment in mental health resources, professional training opportunities, and continued strong community-police partnerships. Chief Moon and Chief Murphy are incredible, and supporting them to ensure the future pipeline of talent into their teams remains full of highly-qualified candidates who desire to work here is essential. Reputation matters ā if Peachtree City is known as a place where first responders are respected and supported, recruitment becomes easier and retention becomes natural.
Community & Identity
Q12. What do you see as its biggest threat that must be addressed?
Joe Campbell
The biggest threat is losing what makes us unique: the village concept, green spaces, and cart-path lifestyle that drew families here in the first place. High-density sprawl, unchecked traffic, and careless development (including highway overpasses in the heart of our city) could turn us into āAnywhere, USA,ā ā another overcrowded suburb. Thatās not why we live here ā and I wonāt let it happen. Once our village identity is gone, we canāt get it back. My priority is to hold the line against sprawl, preserve village-centered growth, and protect the small-town feel that keeps families and businesses choosing Peachtree City. I love this city and its people too much, and I know firsthand how to address todayās problems in a way that maintains that feel.
Clint Holland
The biggest threat is high density housing being built in Peachtree City. That would include high-rise apartments, condos, townhomes, and general urban sprawl. Currently multi-family housing is 16% of our total housing units in our city, while the average multifamily units in US cities our size is 14%. Peachtree City has more multifamily housing that other cities our size thus it does not need any more of that type of housing built in our city.
Our special place on this earth, called Peachtree City, does not need to become another urbanized suburb of Atlanta with more multifamily housing, so that is why I voted recently for a moratorium to stop any multi-family housing re-zoning for 6 months, while we permanently change the zoning designation on multifamily housing.
Q13. What specific steps should Peachtree City take to attract the next generation of families and businesses?
Clint Holland
In my review of the latest 2025 demographic data for Peachtree City, we are already attracting the next generation of young families to our city. As the older generation continues to shrinks below 19%, the younger generation of 30-55 year olds now comprises approx. 48%. They are moving to Peachtree City for many reasons: lifestyle, schools, amenities, safety, recreation, rising home values, lots of top-notch restaurants, convenience to Atlanta airport, good jobs, and suburban living with adequate land for their children to play outside safely.
Peachtree City naturally attracts the people who want to live the lifestyle we have so carefully created over decades, and have their children get a very good education for their future success.
Joe Campbell
To attract the next generation, we must double down on what sets us apart. Families move here for excellent schools, stellar safety, and an incredible quality of life ā we must keep all three strong. That means protecting our Police and Fire teams and, ensuring they both continue to receive strong support and can recruit amazing talent. It means continuing to build a sense of community, where everyone is heard and valued, and can collectively enjoy modern recreation and amenities.
We also build the next generation by honoring the existing one. Iām proud that my in-laws have joined us here in Peachtree City, and especially cherish moments where the 55+ crowd can engage with and help shape our children ā the Veteranās Day Parade at Crabapple Lane is a beautiful example of such.
If we make Peachtree City the obvious choice for raising kids and starting businesses, we secure our future.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.