Fake vehicle emissions tests cost man 10 years in prison

A Jonesboro man will serve 10 years in prison for his part in a fraud scheme relating to phony emissions tests issued at a north Fayette County business.

DeAngelo Lacosta Smith, 39, of Goswell Drive, Jonesboro, entered a guilty plea to Fayette County Superior Court Judge Robert M. Crawford Monday morning, according to Fayette County Assistant District Attorney Robert W. Smith, Jr.

Beyond the 10-year prison sentence, DeAngelo Smith was fined $25,000 and will serve an additional 10 years on probation following his release from prison.

DeAngelo Smith is one of 14 co-defendants in the case, all charged with various counts of violating the Georgia racketeering influenced and corrupt organizations act, commonly known as RICO charges. He pled guilty to all three RICO charges he was indicted on, prosecutors said.

Also Monday, co-defendant Joe Douglas of Kingston Road, Atlanta pled guilty to a reduced charge of computer forgery and was sentenced by Crawford to two years in prison followed by eight years’ probation and a $2,500 fine.

Two other co-defendants pled guilty to reduced charges on Feb. 5: Markaila Patricia Ann Caesar, 20, of Goswell Drive in Jonesboro and Michael Keith Knight, 40, of Foxbury Drive, Riverdale. Caesar pled guilty to computer-related forgery and got 270 days in prison, the remainder of a two-year sentence on probation and a $1,500 fine. Knight pled guilty to two counts of computer fraud and was sentenced to eight years’ probation with a $1,500 fine.

Knight is expected to testify in the trial against the other defendants in the case, which is scheduled for Sept. 3 with the remaining 10 co-defendants.

The charges stemmed from a lengthy investigation conducted by the Environmental Protection Division of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources on Smith Emissions located at 101 Kenwood Road, just off Ga. Highway 85 North.

According to the indictment filed in the case, the phony tests were rung up over a period of three months. In some cases, the defendants are accused of using an older car as a “surrogate” for a vehicle that would not pass an emissions inspection and thus would likely require costly repairs.

Court documents do not outline how much money was pocketed for the bogus inspections, whose results were transmitted electronically to DNR in a bid to make it appear as if the vehicles passed emissions inspections when they almost certainly would not have, officials indicated in arrest warrants.

Prosecutors do not know exactly how much money was made in the scam.

jamijuneevans
jamijuneevans's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/11/2012
how stupid could they be

I have been an emissions inspector for years now and know that the Georgia clean air force and the E.P.D. do under cover stings all the time. Just like the police do the "send an officer that looks 16 into a store to buy beer to see if they get carded" The E.P.D. sends cars to random stations to see if the inspectors do the tests correctly and to see if they get failed for certain things they purposely removed (i.e. catalytic converters, fuel caps, and check engine light bulbs.)I feel that this is a form of entrapment which is illegal, but who am I to say. but...

for these people testing cars and thinking that they could get away with what they did knowing that the E.P.D. tracks stuff like this and there is a computer out there watching for unusual patterns like cars that fail every year that magically pass a day or 2 later after they fail.... or on newer vehicles that we connect to the computer of the car and gets ID numbers that can be tracked.

To all my fellow inspectors that are reading this. Is an easy $100 worth 10 years in prison, $25,000 in fines, you loosing your family, loosing you "life"...? If $100 is a big temptation to you, you need to find another job... FAST. you will get offers lots of them and you have to say NO.

highflyer2
highflyer2's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/29/2007
20 years ?

You can get less time for murder! He was stupid coping a plea!

NUK_1
NUK_1's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/17/2007
10 years +10 probation

I'm guessing here that he might have had a previous felony conviction or two on his record because that is one really stiff sentence for a non-violent crime, especially when it's revealed that the prosecution isn't sure how much money they scammed in the first place and the other dudes seemed to have minimal sentences.

Citizen_Steve
Citizen_Steve's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/20/2005
Free DeAngelo

Damn, where am I to get my certificate now? I can't afford new catalytic converters.

Steve

Recent Comments