The Housing Crisis And Peachtree City

13
2047

I feel like I’m one of the lucky ones. Granted, there were a ton of things within my control that allowed me to move to Peachtree City and own a home. I worked hard to secure a good salary, avoided fun purchases to save for a downpayment, and negotiated a favorable deal with the seller.

However, one of the biggest factors allowing me to move to Peachtree City was timing. When I was ready to buy a home for my growing family in 2012, housing was both available and affordable. 

Unfortunately, that’s not the case for many people today. 

America’s Housing Crisis

The housing market has undergone a dramatic shift, making homeownership increasingly out of reach for millions. What was once attainable through hard work and planning is now a distant dream for many, primarily due to a severe lack of housing and skyrocketing prices. At the heart of the crisis is a fundamental issue: demand far exceeds supply. The National Association of Realtors reported a 6.5 million home shortage in 2023—an issue that has been building for decades. Much of this shortage traces back to the 2008 financial crisis when the housing market’s collapse forced builders to scale back operations. Despite a recovery, construction has remained well below historical averages.

Zoning laws and regulatory barriers have only exacerbated the problem. In many areas, single-family zoning is the dominant force, limiting the development of higher-density housing options like apartments or duplexes. Additionally, rising construction costs have further complicated matters. While lumber prices, which spiked during the pandemic, have recently stabilized, materials like steel and concrete remain expensive. According to a 2022 report from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), nearly 24% of the total cost of building a new home comes from complying with various regulations. Developers pass these added costs onto buyers, making it harder for families to afford homes.

This issue is compounded by wage stagnation and income inequality. The National Low Income Housing Coalition’s 2023 report found that a worker earning the federal minimum wage would need to work 96 hours per week to afford a modest two-bedroom rental. Meanwhile, wealthier households can outbid lower-income families, further restricting affordable housing options.

Institutional investors have also played a role in this crisis. By purchasing large numbers of single-family homes, they reduce supply and drive up prices. Many of these investors convert homes into rental properties and charge above-market rents. Short-term rental platforms like Airbnb have further commercialized housing, limiting long-term rental options for residents who need stable housing.

Finally, demographic shifts continue to strain the housing market. Millennials, the largest generation in the workforce, are reaching home-buying age. Older adults are “aging in place,” holding onto homes that might otherwise go to younger families and further compounding the demand for housing.

What Could Peachtree City Do To Help Solve The Crisis?

Addressing the housing crisis requires large-scale changes at the national level along with shifts in societal behavior. However, Peachtree City has opportunities to make an impact at the local level through several proactive measures.

One of the most direct solutions would be to revisit zoning regulations. Currently, zoning has heavily favored single-family homes with 83% of the city’s housing stock made up of these residences and just 11% of apartments, 3% of condominiums, and 3% of townhomes. This imbalance limits the availability of diverse housing options and makes it more difficult for potential residents to find affordable homes. Peachtree City could modify the density in already-zoned residential areas near existing commercial centers. The city’s 2022 Comprehensive Plan already supports this through the concept of “step-down density,” where housing density is highest near Village Centers and decreases as you move outward. This would concentrate growth in areas already well-served by infrastructure, helping the city grow without compromising its suburban character.

Mixed-use development is another solution. Peachtree City’s Village Centers present a prime opportunity to incorporate residential units into existing commercial zones. By doing so, the city could maintain its Village Concept while introducing much-needed housing in areas already equipped with infrastructure. The 2022 Comprehensive Plan provides a strong framework for this approach, recommending retail and office spaces on the ground floor and residential units on upper levels. Mixed-use developments like these have revitalized commercial areas in other communities, providing affordable housing options while boosting the local economy.

While new developments are essential, Peachtree City can also address housing demand by revitalizing existing properties. Many homes, townhomes, and condominiums in the city are aging (the average single-family home is 33 years old). Owners could renovate these properties to modern standards to help alleviate some of the housing challenges without the need for rezoning or large-scale new developments. This approach preserves the character of the community while improving the overall livability of its housing stock.

Peachtree City can also support nonprofit housing initiatives. For example, Southern Crescent Habitat for Humanity, which spoke at the November 21st city council meeting, builds and repairs homes for families meeting specific income criteria. Partnering with nonprofits like this can help address housing shortages while fostering community stability. 

Regional collaboration is another important step. By working with neighboring communities such as Fayetteville, Tyrone, and Senoia, Peachtree City can ensure its growth aligns with the broader region’s needs. A regional housing task force, composed of local officials, business leaders, and developers, could collaborate to develop a shared vision for sustainable growth.

Finally, Peachtree City can continue leveraging state and federal programs. The Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA) Housing Tax Credit Program incentivizes affordable housing development for households earning between 20% and 80% of the Area Median Income. Projects like HearthSide Peachtree City, a senior-living community for adults aged 62 and older, have been supported by this program. By continuing to leverage these resources, Peachtree City can expand affordable housing options to meet growing population needs.

Does Peachtree City Want To Take Action?

While the proposed solutions to the housing crisis at the local level have the potential to address our growing needs, it’s essential to consider whether Peachtree City is ready—or willing—to embrace these changes. Previous housing proposals have faced stiff resistance for a variety of perceived reasons.

Peachtree City has long prided itself on being a retreat from the hustle and bustle of Atlanta and its congestion, noise, and crime. Many residents view the prospect of becoming more like an urbanized area as a threat to the very essence of what makes our town unique. The fear of losing the suburban charm and slower pace of life that defines Peachtree City is a powerful motivator against any changes that might compromise these qualities.

Another concern voiced by residents revolves around the potential impact on property values. Peachtree City has enjoyed a stable housing market with steadily appreciating home values. Many residents fear that introducing higher-density housing, particularly affordable housing projects, could harm the value of their properties. The concern stems from the belief that multi-family housing in single-family zones reduces the desirability of neighboring areas and leads to a decline in home prices.

Traffic and congestion are also significant worries. Many are concerned that more residents would overwhelm the city’s roads, leading to traffic jams and longer commute times. With Peachtree City’s network of roads and multi-use paths already facing capacity issues in certain areas, adding more housing without addressing the transportation infrastructure could create significant challenges.

Straining resources is another consideration. Peachtree City’s existing infrastructure has served the community well overall. However, introducing more housing, particularly higher-density developments, could place additional pressure on these resources. With an increased population, the demand for public services, utilities, and recreational spaces would rise, requiring significant upgrades to meet these needs. Without careful planning and investment, these added pressures could negatively affect the quality of life for current and future residents.

What Does Inaction Look LIke?

Given the negative possibilities, the resistance to changes in Peachtree City’s approach to housing is understandable. I share many of these concerns, particularly around rezoning. However, we must also consider the broader implications of doing nothing. 

Failing to adapt to housing demand could erode Peachtree City’s ability to attract and retain a diverse population, including younger families and workers. As housing costs rise, middle-class families may be pushed out, leaving behind only wealthier households. This demographic shift could create an imbalance that affects our social fabric and community engagement.

Inaction could also exacerbate the regional housing crisis. As neighboring cities and counties adjust to population growth and rising housing demand, Peachtree City risks being left behind. Without embracing new housing strategies, the city may miss out on critical state and federal funding opportunities and increase pressure on local infrastructure as more people commute into the city for work, contributing to congestion and further straining services.

Finally, inaction could jeopardize Peachtree City’s economic future. The city is home to many employers, and its ability to attract and retain talent depends on offering adequate housing options. Without sufficient housing supply, businesses may struggle to recruit and retain workers, potentially slowing economic growth and limiting opportunities for residents.

So What Do We Do?

The problems we’ve discussed are real and require thoughtful consideration. However, how we address these issues ultimately rests with you, the residents. Will we maintain the status quo, potentially leaving ourselves unprepared for the challenges ahead? Or will we take proactive steps to embrace growth while addressing the issues that could impact our community’s preservation?

The choice is yours.

What’s Next For This Column

This is my last article for 2024. I’ll be back in January with a preview of next November’s municipal elections here in Peachtree City. In the meantime, if there’s a topic you’d like me to explore in the future, please feel free to share your suggestions through the contact form on this website.

Have a great holiday season!

13 COMMENTS

  1. Kenneth was against building up PTC in an interview in 2022 for this paper.
    Stating: “I’m opposed to developing additional apartments within Peachtree City because there is no property that would work with our Comprehensive Plan, and I will support two actions to prevent these units (none of which require another moratorium)”

    You can read the whole interview here: https://thecitizen.com/2022/10/16/post-3-candidate-kenneth-hamner-answers-the-citizens-questions/

    What happened Kenny, the developers get in touch with you?

    Another failed wanna be politician talking out of both side of his mouth.

    Zero credibility.

  2. Locally, suggesting higher density housing in PTC is akin to nationally, suggesting changes to Social Security. It is a nonstarter and the best way to lose re-election. Additionally, the local high income, majority conservative PTC electorate couldn’t give a fig about assisting the less fortunate if it impacts their property values or lifestyle in the slightest.

    Mr. Hammer, you might as well move on to the next topic.

    • I’d argue the conservative PTC electorate does indeed care (or give a fig) each year by assisting the less fortunate with their Christmas donations of unwrapped toys around the holidays. It makes them feel all warm and fuzzy inside like when they give away $15 turkeys around Thanksgiving.

      • Well then Doon you may need a history lesson…most donations of all amounts and kind generally come from your disrespected “conservative …electorate” and their ilk established the world’s greatest humanitarian organizations over the past century…my experience with liberal electorate (if they vote at all) is their narcissistic obsessions with themselves.
        Prove me incorrect.

        • V.H. there are merits to your argument, but it is nuanced. Conservatives donate much to faith-based charities that do a lot of good work for the needy in the community. Progressives often favor higher tax revenues to be spent on these same populations through government aid programs that also assist them. The two groups seem to have different ideas about the best way to offer assistance.

          • Hi STF
            Hope you are well and Merry Christmas. If I can add here. Part of this has to do with purpose.

            I have been a finance leader at two public housing authorities. When I was at Atlanta housing, the CEO wanted to spend $1M on dance lessons for seniors.

            On one hand, that hand nothing to do with housing, but on the other these towers are basically warehouses for the poor.

            The question is whether the public is supporting HUD to give people dance lessons?

            When I was down at Mobile Housing, I taught personal finance classes at night in the community center, without pay. The only cost was paper for hand outs.

    • FWIW, I’m about 0% concerned about my property values. I definitely care a great deal about things that could negatively impact the quality of life here. Something that might impact it “in the slightest” I’d probably not bother to comment on.

      This is a pretty weak argument about assisting the less fortunate. There are a lot of people with much bigger problems than “I can’t afford a house I like in the neighborhood I like in PTC right now”. So, just because you donate to the Salvation Army or volunteer at Fayette Senior Services or the Food Bank, don’t think that’s anywhere near as important as someone who has to live in Tyrone and drive 4 extra miles.

    • Hi “Stranger” we agree on this… “the local high income, majority conservative PTC electorate couldn’t give a fig about assisting the less fortunate if it impacts their property values or lifestyle in the slightest”…but you and I agree for different reasons.
      Sustaining equity values of homes and neighborhoods for those that have invested 10-20-30 or more years in the stability of PTC as a city of primarily single-family homes does not involve a “fig” but rather a legacy started by the founders of PTC.
      The less fortunate…which is not the point of the article…are better served in urban areas where helpful established resources are already established.

      • Merry Christmas V.H. I am not making a political commentary, but rather stating a sober observation of the PTC citizenry. Anyone can spin it as she wishes, but worry about housing for people in our community who are not well-heeled is not now, nor has never been, a concern. Debate about it is a nonstarter, so why devote cyber ink to this issue?

    • Kenneth was against building up PTC in an interview in 2022 for this paper.
      Stating: “I’m opposed to developing additional apartments within Peachtree City because there is no property that would work with our Comprehensive Plan, and I will support two actions to prevent these units (none of which require another moratorium)”

      You can read the whole interview here: https://thecitizen.com/2022/10/16/post-3-candidate-kenneth-hamner-answers-the-citizens-questions/

      What happened Kenny, the developers get in touch with you?

      Another failed wanna be politician talking out of both side of his mouth.

      Zero credibility.

  3. There’s an awful lot to unpack in this article, so I’ll address just a few points:

    There is no “housing crisis” – the definition of a crisis is “intense difficulty, trouble or danger”. We can’t afford a 4 bedroom/3 bath home in North Cove is not a crisis. Neither is “we’re having extreme difficulty in finding a house we want to buy at a price we like in a neighborhood we like in PTC instead of 5 miles away right now”.

    I suggest that when you’re trying to sell me something or convince me of something don’t start out by exaggerating.

    I think it’s bit off to claim that “in 2012, housing was both available and affordable. Unfortunately, that’s not the case for many people today.” In 2012 housing in PTC was unaffordable for many people. And housing in PTC is available today. The percentage who can afford to buy a home in PTC that they like may have declined, but this isn’t quite the yes/no situation it is being presented as.

    Using the term “affordable” in this context is very shaky. Presumably, it means very different things to different people. People in the same financial situation may have opposite opinions on whether a particular house is affordable depending on what else they spend money on (private school tuition, luxury vacations, expensive cars, etc.).

    I hope I don’t seem jaded, but the National Association of Realtors, National Homebuilders Association and the National Low Income Housing Coalition are likely approaching this discussion with different objectives than most residents of PTC.

    The risks of inaction sound like PTC could remain a wonderful place to live that not everybody can afford. Curiously, we are told that inaction will both lead to PTC becoming a haven for only wealthy people and jeopardize our economic future. This is reminiscent of Yogi Berra’s comment “nobody goes there anymore, it’s too crowded”.

    FWIW, I’m not necessarily opposed to some of the suggestions made here, but I’d want to hear why it’s good for us, not based on some (in my opinion) dubious concerns.

  4. I don’t see any problem with “In many areas, single-family zoning is the dominant force, limiting the development of higher-density housing options like apartments or duplexes”.
    People who live here came here because of what PTC was and remains primarily… A city of single-family homes.

    Just go to Newnan if you want to see your suggestions in action.
    I respect your thoughts…but I have moved 3 times in my life because of what is happening in Newnan.
    Maybe take your ideas to Brooks, Sharpsburg or Senoia.