[Editor's note: How much is
enough? Especially during the holidays, it's a question many Americans
struggle with. How much is enough free time, family time, money, food,
household space, savings, etc.
The Center for a New American
Dream offers a column by author Alan AtKisson that examines the concept
of "enough," using a Swedish notion lagom as a model. What,
he imagines, would happen if society were modeled around the concept of
enough? And what are the implications of our American definition of "enough"
for the rest of the world?]
My friend from Sweden has two
towels. Actually she has three, but the third she uses only for travel.
When the bathroom towels are dirty, she washes them. When they wear out,
she buys two more and very good ones, so they'll last a long time.
"Why do I need more than
two?" she says. "Det 'r lagom."
What she said in Swedish does
not exactly translate to "This is enough." The word "lagom"
pronounced melodically, the "la" a falling tone, the "gom"
(rhymes with "home") a shorter syllable that's right back up
where the "la" started means something like, "exactly the
right amount."
What a delight to learn this
word! When it comes to thinking about responses to overconsumption and
consumerism, we are stuck, in English, with far less pleasing words. "Enough"
sounds to most American ears as though it had the word "barely"
just in front of it. For some reason, "enough" never sounds
like ... enough. "Balance" sounds difficult; I'm always losing
mine. "Sufficiency" carries the whiff of technical economic
jargon. Even "simplicity," the current fad-word-of-the-moment
in some marketing circles, tends to appeal only to those folks with either
a moral commitment or a serious case of overwhelm.
We need a concept for thinking
about how much, in terms of stuff, is the right amount and the Swedes
have given us a word for it.
The concept of "lagom"
can be applied to everything from cake to carbon dioxide emissions. What
is "lagom" for chocolate cake? For me, it's usually a little
bit more than "enough." But what's "lagom" for CO2?
Only as much as the ecosystems of the Earth can reabsorb, and no more.
"Lagom" allows for more than enough but it still sets limits.
What if our society were organized
around the concept of "lagom"? Not that Sweden is organized
that way; although my friend is hardly an extremist, she is a more enthusiastic
"lagom"-ist than many of her fellow Swedes. (Imagine the Vikings
taking only "lagom" when they plundered!) And most Americans
would have trouble just pronouncing it. But I have developed a small fascination
with this word, because it has an attractive quality that "enough,"
"sufficient," and even "simple" often lack.
Most people in the world do
not want enough. They want more. They certainly want more than the bare
minimum, and research suggests they want more than those around them.
This desire for more seems to be deeply wired in the human organism. We
developed over millennia in hostile environments, both natural and social.
To have more than we need has always been our first defense against the
vagaries of an uncertain future. Hoarding is the first act of those who
believe themselves to be in the path of a storm (or a marauding army of
plundering Vikings, for that matter).
So while there will always
be those of us who love the idea of "enough-ness" and "voluntary
simplicity," it seems likely that such concepts will never quite
be ... well ... enough to transform the masses of humanity (or the marauding
army of corporations vying to fill their houses with stuff, in a kind
of reverse-plunder operation).
But it does seem possible to
promote a sensible Swedish sense of "lagom" worldwide if we
can find other good words for it because it speaks more to what people
actually want. Let's admit that it's very nice to have good shoes. No
one can be faulted for wanting them. But does a person really need 15
pairs? No. But is one pair enough? Perhaps not. "Lagom" acknowledges
that people have varying needs and desires at different times.
They want nice things, and
comfort, and security. They want more than the bare minimum, and they
might even need it. If their desire for more than enough is accepted,
even supported, perhaps they would be more willing to consider how much
is too much.
Clearly, here in America, we
are far beyond the limits of "lagom." Once in a while I make
a point of wandering into a Costco or a Sam's Club huge retail warehouses
full of consumer goods, on sale cheap. The spaces are large enough to
house a submarine assembly plant. You can buy everything from taco shells
to trampolines to model wooden boats, by the crate. The shopping carts
are as big as a small car.
Walking around the aisles of
one of these stores allows me to indulge in several radically different
feelings: raw consumer lust, great moral outrage, and aching environmental
angst.
But when I took my same Swedish
friend to see one of these places, her response was more practical. "I
suppose people can save quite a lot of money here," she noted. "And
it's better to buy some things in larger quantities." (Not towels.)
"But perhaps it's just very tempting to take too much in such a place."
Nobody really needs too much,
and in fact, most people don't really want it. But nobody wants too little.
Perhaps our vision for a sustainable world should include not just enough
for all, but "lagom" for all, with fewer temptations to take
too much.
And while I could write a great
deal more about this lovely new addition to my vocabulary, perhaps this
page, too, is "lagom."
[Alan AtKisson is the author
of "Believing Cassandra: An Optimist Looks at a Pessimist's World."
He is president of AtKisson and Associates, Inc., a consulting firm focused
on accelerating sustainable development. He is also a senior fellow with
the independent policy institute Redefining Progress, and formerly its
program and executive director. Mr. AtKisson is a member of the board
of directors of the Center for a New American Dream. For more information
about the Center, click on www.newdream.org, or call 877-68-DREAM.]






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…