All right,
Fayettevillians, there's good news and there's bad news
for those of you who are concerned about the Hooters
issue.
The bad
news (for those who oppose Hooters) is that the
Fayetteville Planning Commission would be hanging by a
very thin thread, legally speaking, if it were to deny a
development plan for Hooters based on moral issues.
The
commission has no legal leg to stand on if it turns down
a restaurant because its wait staff is scantily clad and
its logo is offensive to the sensitive.
True, the
city does have an ordinance that regulates sexually
oriented establishments - basically regulates them
right out of town - and it could possibly be argued
that Hooters is a sexually oriented establishment. But in
order for that ordinance to hold up in court, it has to
be very specifically worded as to which body parts can
and can't be shown, how much touching between customers
and performers (er, I mean waitresses) is allowed, and
that sort of thing.
I'm no
legal expert, but I think the commission would find
itself shockingly exposed, legally, if it denied Hooters
on those sorts of grounds.
The good
news, for opponents, is that there are so many other
hurdles the Hooters people will have to get over that I
will be very surprised if we ever see the old owl eyes
winking at us as we drive along Highway 85.
Hurdle
number 1: The proposed site for the restaurant is smack
across the street from Kids R Kids day care center.
That's an
emotional issue for opponents, who argue that allowing
sexually oriented establishments into town sets a bad
example for the younger set. With the restaurant's back
side right in plain view of a school, fuel is naturally
added to that flame.
But getting
down to the bare legal issues that the commission must
deal with, the question is whether the day care center
qualifies as a school, because establishments that serve
alcohol are not allowed within 300 feet of schools.
Hurdle
number 2: If that question is resolved in favor of
Hooters, then there are the itty bitty, nitty gritty
technical issues that the Planning Commission deals with
every week. Fayetteville's planners are famous (or
infamous, depending upon your point of view) for making
companies, especially franchise type businesses, toe the
line on the fine points of the city's architectural
standards.
Hooters,
like so many before it, came to the city with a building
that looks like an amusement park, asking the city to
vary its standards so the company can put forth its
corporate image.
Not gonna
happen.
A franchise
building that is identifiable as such is nothing but a
great big sign, and Fayetteville's sign laws allow only
one small sign per building.
If it wants
to live in Fayetteville, Hooters is going to have to
redraw its plans so that its building fits Fayetteville's
image, rather than asking the city to redraw its
ordinances so the city will fit Hooters' image.
Hurdle
number 3: There is the small matter of some major
improvements on Banks Road, required of JDN Development
Corp., developer of the shopping center Hooters wants to
nest in.
JDN made
some of the required improvements, but more are required
in its development agreement with the city before anymore
businesses can be added to the center. JDN is in
financial trouble, so don't expect to see those
improvements tomorrow or the next day.
I have been
blown out of the water before on predictions like this,
and if it happens this time, I'll eat my crow pie next
week.
But I'll be
amazed if the commission approves the development plan
next week. I give it about a 40 percent chance of
outright denial, and a 60 percent chance of being tabled
so the company can try and work out the problems with
city ordinances.
Until those
problems are dealt with, Hooters is flapping in the
breeze.
Meanwhile,
people who are not so opposed to Hooters are kind of
quietly hoping the deal goes through so that Fayetteville
will have a sports bar. In addition to scantily clad
waitresses, most Hooters locations also have a bunch of
big screen TV's tuned to sporting events, so the patrons
will have something to look at while the waitresses are
in the kitchen turning in orders, I suppose.
There's not
really a good sports bar in Fayetteville. There are some
restaurants with TV's, but they're not set up so that
every seat can see, and they're not all big screens.
I'll bet if
someone were to come up with a plan for a sports
bar/restaurant with a different name and different logo
and it met all the city's architectural guidelines and
was built in a properly zoned location (preferably one of
the many empty commercial buildings around town), it
would be approved with hardly a stir.
And if that
person had plans to dress waitresses in hot pants and
halters, that wouldn't be an issue, because there's no
place in the city's approval process where the developer
is asked, "What exactly will your waitresses (or
waiters) be wearing?"
The
objection to Hooters seems to be that it's so... well, out there.






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…