The Peachtree City Council
recently renewed a moratorium on all annexations. But the
council members left the door open to consider annexing
nearly 1,000 acres north of Ga. Highway 54 and west of
Ga. Highway 74.
Let's talk in Part I about
the West Village, that lingering figment of planners' and
developers' imaginations.
The concept is a fairly
recent one, despite what you may hear from those same
planners and developers.
Way back in the 1970s,
there were some ambitious drawings that showed a Lake
McIntosh on the Fayette-Coweta border, formed by damming
Line Creek in the vicinity of the uninhabited area west
of Falcon Field. It was south of Ga. Highway 54, and
would have included some fancy subdivisions, courtesy of
then-Peachtree City Development Corp. and its patron,
landowner Bessemer Securities (and later, The Equitable
Life Assurance Society of the U.S.).
Those drawings I have
seen with my own two peepers, having dwelled nearby
since early 1977. Lake Mac disappeared under intercounty
squabbling and Lake Kedron on Flat Creek was its eventual
replacement.
The point is - the
"Village" was well south of what is now being
discussed as the newest and last of Peachtree City's
village developments. Now there's squabbling over what is
to be built on land bordering Hwy. 54, long zoned
commercial, long before there was ever a Planterra Ridge.
I myself bought a home in a
quiet neighborhood, filled with trees, next to forests
and cow pastures. That vista has changed - now I
awake to the rumbling of earth-moving equipment and
road-building machines, converting what was once a forest
to 399 apartments and 160 or so small homes.
Needless to say, I am
less than thrilled by the forest being replaced with
apartment parking lots. But, it's not my land, and it was
zoned for that before I ever moved in, 22 years ago.
Can't stop that development
of land zoned commercial for a quarter century. It's
what's being talked about just north of that area that
I'm most concerned about - the new West
Village.
First, a few definitions.
Annexing: that's when a
city takes into its incorporated boundaries land that was
in the unincorporated county. Annexing, by the way, is
completely optional. No city ever is legally bound to
approve annexation requests, unlike rezoning.
Density: what you get when
people occupy an area. Some folks like high density,
others prefer low density. Peachtree City, for the most
part, is - in my judgment - medium to high
density: about two to four dwelling units per acre on
average
(divide the city's area of
15,000 acres by its population of about 33,000, and leave
out green belts, commercial and industrial areas).
I would consider low
density as what mostly prevails in the unincorporated
county - usually less than one house per acre, and
often one house per two acres or more.
What developers want: high
density and sewer connections.
What annexing offers: high
density and sewer connections.
Why sewer? Because in the
unincorporated county, residents must pay for and
maintain viable septic tank drainage fields, usually
requiring more than a half-acre of land per house. That
limits the number of homes that can be built on a given
plot of land. That decreases return on the developers'
investment.
City sewer service opens up
vastly greater numbers of units per acre. That means more
money. That's why developers want to be annexed into
cities.
If you prefer greater
numbers of people on the city's west side - by a
factor of three- to fivefold - you should support
Peachtree City's annexing the nearly 1,000 acres now in
the unincorporated county. Even at the extremely unlikely
lowest city density, that would add from 2,000 to 3,000
more folks to our population. Add a few apartments, or
townhouses, and the numbers could swell above 5,000
- and nearly that many more automobiles. And that's
before any commercial development.
The new apartments
and small homes under construction adjacent to Wynnmeade
will add about 1,200 people and nearly that many cars to
the west side's already bulging traffic count.
How many would likely be
built under its current county zoning? Look at what's
there now. The Line Creek wetlands drastically limit
septic tank developments. Probably the maximum number of
homes that would be allowed under the most dense county
zoning would be under 400 homes - maybe not even
half that many.
Which would you rather have
- under 400 homes in the county or 1,500 to 3,000
dwelling units or more inside Peachtree City?
But, some ask, what about
Tyrone? What if Tyrone annexes that area?
In Part II, I'll talk about
the concept of "protection by annexation."
[Cal
Beverly is editor and publisher of The Citizen and a
22-year resident of Wynnmeade, one of the city's oldest
subdivisions.






Easy button Return it to long suffering taxpayers including those who have paid huge tabs to educate other people's kids…